I don't hate Kodak. I simply ignore them. I don't buy anything made by Kodak today.
Yes, a couple of these same "economists" went through this nonsense with Fujifilm on a different thread. Of course, we know that both Fuji and Kodak specifically aimed their pricing structure to destroy their ability to take photographs.
No, they aimed their pricing to fish the hipster Joe...
Please shut up, we don't need your "lesson".
It's yours and Sirius Glass fault.
When you are right, there is no need for modesty nor humility. After all it has been said and it has been written, "Right is Might" or was it "Might is Right"? Whatever I don't need no stinkin' modesty, besides I gave up humility for Lent along with abstinence.
Eastman Kodak is a printing services company that still has a relatively small, historical division that makes film.
Recently, I put in the time and effort to replace deteriorated foam surrounds on the woofers of my 24 year old Allison CD-9s. They're driven by an Adcom GFA-555. Today I was listening to the following CD
Recently, I put in the time and effort to replace deteriorated foam surrounds on the woofers of my 24 year old Allison CD-9s. They're driven by an Adcom GFA-555. Today I was listening to the following CD
which was recorded, performers arrayed around a stereo mike, in the very studio where my AES conversation with Bob Fine took place. Anyone who believes vinyl is superior in any way to a competent playback of that CD has drunk so much Kool-Aid it's overflowing and pouring onto their keyboard.
Exactly the kind of elitist techno-blather response I was expecting. Are you posting as the ghost of Jim Jones?
If you had any idea how good my hearing is, you'd slither away with your tail between your legs. Troll.
Recently, I put in the time and effort to replace deteriorated foam surrounds on the woofers of my 24 year old Allison CD-9s. They're driven by an Adcom GFA-555. Today I was listening to the following CD
which was recorded, performers arrayed around a stereo mike, in the very studio where my AES conversation with Bob Fine took place. Anyone who believes vinyl is superior in any way to a competent playback of that CD has drunk so much Kool-Aid it's overflowing and pouring onto their keyboard.
Unlike you, my ears are mid-fi.
Ah, the burdens of superhuman perception. Whenever anyone posts "believe me," a red flag goes up to indicate the writer is really communicating "I'm full of it."
By the tanker truck load.
Objection overruled -- by reality.
No, I did not. You drink the Kool-Aid by believing that whatever 99.9999999999th percentile hearing acuity you claim to possess is relevant to the purpose of systems designed for listening to recorded music. Remember that -- music? The reason for all this is widespread dissemination of music to persons not present when it was performed. Among those whose hearing falls short of what you say yours is, i.e. pretty damn near 100% of the human population, pops, ticks, swooshes, etc. (defects ubiquitous with vinyl) are vastly more apparent and annoying than the digital artifacts you hear and complain about. The vast preponderance of listeners couldn't hear the digital artifacts.
Well, I remember on APUG some zealots of analog photography making some insulting comments (dog s**t and the like) whenever the discussion touched ever so remotely anything d*****l. Disclosure: I do all my hobby photography on film, and use d* only for documentation.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |
