Perhaps that attempted denigration would be unnecessary if you paid attention to the last paragraph of my post you partially quoted. No measurements involved.
My audio activities revolve around listening, not measuring.
Perhaps that attempted denigration would be unnecessary if you paid attention to the last paragraph of my post you partially quoted. No measurements involved.Reality according to the "perfect measurements = perfect sound" BORG!
Well, I remember on APUG some zealots of analog photography making some insulting comments (dog s**t and the like) whenever the discussion touched ever so remotely anything d*****l. Disclosure: I do all my hobby photography on film, and use d* only for documentation.
I never have attempted and never will attempt to contact you. As for your other two requests, sorry, the answer is no. I'll continue replying to anything I want. You may, of course, feel free to place me on your ignore list. That would help ameliorate your difficulty in dealing with others who disagree.Sal. Please never contact me, reply to me posts or otherwise interact with me.
It's "digital." Feel free to spell it out. There's no reason not to at PHOTRIO. Just like there's no reason not to spell out eBay. They're all just words. Words with meaning....the dreaded d******...the familiar of d******...
I practise radical honesty.
You, sir, are full of it.
My audio activities revolve around listening, not measuring.
There you are that's the answer. I joined 3 years earlier in 2005 when all things were still sweetness and light. By 2008 the rot must have started to set inWell, I remember on APUG some zealots of analog photography making some insulting comments (dog s**t and the like) whenever the discussion touched ever so remotely anything d*****l. .
If Kodak... or someone... comes out with a "real" infra-red film, like HIE, then I will know then that analogue has been truly revived. Time to pick up a new turn table, too!
The Infra red film sold under the Rollie name is not far off the Kodak HIE version but with an antihalation layer included. It would be so easy to omit the AH layer in manufacture then it would be even closer. I don't like the current range of Kodak films except the T Max 100, now if they reintroduced the 25ASA Technical Pan - there was a film without an equal. You had to process it carefully, but if you did and the camera used had been on a tripod the results were astoundingly good.
People, this is embarrassing to read. A few pages ago, this was an interesting and useful thread, and it could be again. This (blowing up threads with asinine bickering) makes people to be less likely to visit Photrio. Perhaps you don't care, but many here do.
Many people here will not realize how earthshaking this post truly is!I don't miss Kodachrome as much as I use to.
As is this reply.My last response to Sal was meant to be constructive...
Nope. Neither readily accessible nor any more necessary than Leica or Zeiss lenses are for compariing "analog" and digital.Then perhaps you can spend some time listening to benchmark level playback/equipment?
Are you projecting them.?I am really happy with the current Ektachrome. I don't miss Kodachrome as much as I use to.
I just wish for more film and support in the US from ADOX.
Are you projecting them.?
10-4..... Thank YouI haven't had a chance to project them yet, no.
OK.... Thanks.It projects well.
People, this is embarrassing to read. A few pages ago, this was an interesting and useful thread, and it could be again. This (blowing up threads with asinine bickering) makes people less likely to visit Photrio. Perhaps you don't care, but many here do.
I use Ektachrome 100 and I mainly project. I like it better than Kodachrome now. The color is more natural.OK.... Thanks.
I have been using Provia, and i was just naturally curios.
Thanks Again
Who would have thought that any slide film would return to market...... though it can always go away.I use Ektachrome 100 and I mainly project. I like it better than Kodachrome now. The color is more natural.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?