There's a difference between papers; some papers work OK with an amber safelight (they will also work OK with red) and others (esp. Foma) that really need a red safelight as amber will fog them. So the safest bet is a red safelight. I've personally used red LED strips shielded with an extra layer of rubylith. This has worked well for me for years. There's a limit to how bright you can make it before the paper starts to fog; this depends mostly on the paper you use. E.g. Fomaspeed will fog a a few stops earlier than the much slower Fomatone. So whichever solution you choose, be sure to perform adequate tests as @MattKing outlines above. Note that only testing for fogging of the whites is not adequate! You really need to determine as well whether there's an effect on the contrast, even if the safelight doesn't generate image tone by itself. It can still act as a contrast-reducing fogging exposure.Can anyone recommend what you consider a good safelight? I am only working in black and white, and with variable contrast papers.
This is quite plausible, and to add a little theory to it: part of the reason why amber safelight is preferred by some is because it's just inherently brighter due to the sensitivity of the human eye. See for a brief explanation this page: https://light-measurement.com/spectral-sensitivity-of-eye/ You simply need a lot less yellow light for the same perceived brightness compared to red light.For me, I dislike the red darkroom illumination. I use Ilford paper, because it can be handled at bright and very comfortable orange safelight. The Ilford SL1 darkroom lamp is very bright and safe for Ilford multigrade papers.
Hello,
I am new to darkroom photography. I am setting up an enlarger in a spare bedroom, and developing trays in the bathtub in my only bathroom. Can anyone recommend what you consider a good safelight? I am only working in black and white, and with variable contrast papers.
Thanks,
Phil
Adox makes a red led one that I think is pretty good. I do keep it pointed at the ceiling as to get indirect light from it though. I am probably a bit too paranoid after having a different manufacturer’s safe light fog a few dry plates.
A word of warning concerning "red" LED.I'm using a 660nm LED strip mounted on the ceiling that's running at around 10w. Super bright
I've found this to be virtually universally the case with red LEDs. There's always a small peak in the green spectrum as well. I expect it's due to a minor impurity in the semiconductor. Since it generally doesn't hurt in other applications, apparently it's not worthwhile to fix this.I could determine that, while the visual appearance was indeed "red", there was a small admixture of green light.
That all may be true, but the light I'm using at the distance I'm working doesn't cause any fog and iirc I did the test with a foma paper (though I didn't realize they were more sensitive than others). Interesting idea with the CD, I'll have to try that.A word of warning concerning "red" LED.
I changed from red tungsten bulbs (dim) to red led strips. Using a CD (or DVD, don't remember) as a makeshift spectroscope, I could determine that, while the visual appearance was indeed "red", there was a small admixture of green light. And that lighting did not pass the Kodak test with Fomabrom Variant paper --as pointed out by @koraks, Foma papers are less tolerant.
Your safelight may well be safe, but did you perform the Kodak test?the light I'm using at the distance I'm working doesn't cause any fog
I just tried this and it's a pretty cool trick. Almost impossible to capture the results on camera but it's a pretty clean spectrum. By eye it extends slightly into the more orange-red that my previous 630nm light source was producing, but there's not a trace of visible green. IIRC the strip I bought was intended for horticultural use and uses Samsung LEDsUsing a CD (or DVD, don't remember) as a makeshift spectroscope, I could determine that, while the visual appearance was indeed "red", there was a small admixture of green light.
That looks pretty good!
Most red LEDs I've used gave a very distinct side-band emission in yellow-green part of the spectrum. Yours looks very clean, at least insofar as it's possible to judge from a photo.
That's the spectrum for a warm white LED. You may be looking at an ad for LED products that are offered in various colors and the spectral plot you found was for a warm white type instead of the red variant you're interested in...I suppose this is not suitable at all, right?
For horticulture 650-660nm is usual, yes, but most decorative red LEDs are 620nm. In principle either would work OK for darkroom safelights but it depends mostly on secondary emission bands in the green and yellow part of the spectrum. Even they are there, they are not always included in the spectral plots, so you will have to do additional testing and possibly filtering (using e.g. rubylith) to get rid of the green/yellow light.Basically, the only LED lights that are strictly red (around 650nm usually) are the ones some indoor gardeners are using
You can buy Rubylith from eBay; there's at least one mainland Europe seller.As a sidenote - is there perhaps somebody from Germany / Europe in here, that can tell me whether we have an alternative to Rubylith over here?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?