New LF user. 1963 Crown Graphic.

Near my home (2)

D
Near my home (2)

  • 2
  • 3
  • 69
Not Texas

H
Not Texas

  • 7
  • 1
  • 78
Floating

D
Floating

  • 5
  • 0
  • 35

Forum statistics

Threads
198,536
Messages
2,776,794
Members
99,639
Latest member
LucyPal
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
subtlelikeatrex
Joined
May 10, 2025
Messages
28
Location
Hawaii
Format
Multi Format
It may be a lensboard from a different camera. It may be original but never said "special". It may be a duplicate of the lens that came with the camera. It's possible that camera came with the 127mm Ektar (which would've been an upgrade) or the Optar. But that lens is probably what's always been on it.

Where do I find the serial number on this lens? There’s one clearly visible on the side of the shutter housing but I don’t know if that correlates to the Schneider Kreuznach serial number dates.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,658
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
the serial number on this lens

Here's a picture of a Xenar from an ebay listing. The serial is on the name-ring of the lens.

1751188337019.png
 
OP
OP
subtlelikeatrex
Joined
May 10, 2025
Messages
28
Location
Hawaii
Format
Multi Format
It may be a lensboard from a different camera. It may be original but never said "special". It may be a duplicate of the lens that came with the camera. It's possible that camera came with the 127mm Ektar (which would've been an upgrade) or the Optar. But that lens is probably what's always been on it.

The manufacture code on the camera indicates January 1963 according to graflex.org
The serial no on the lens indicates ~1956/1957
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,658
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
The manufacture code on the camera indicates January 1963 according to graflex.org
The serial no on the lens indicates ~1956/1957

So, the lens is possibly from a different camera. But it's also possible Graflex purchased that lens in 1957 and it was on a shelf for 6 years. Their business was drying up through that period - even using the Xenar lens was an attempt to lower the cost of the camera to sell more of them.

In the meantime, I've never heard anyone say a Xenar is a bad lens.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,275
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I've never heard anyone say a Xenar is a bad lens.

They'd be a double Gauss chauvinist if they did. A Xenar/Tessar was every bit as good in the 1960s as in the 1890s. Likely better, since a number of recalculations incorporated newer glass formulae.
 
OP
OP
subtlelikeatrex
Joined
May 10, 2025
Messages
28
Location
Hawaii
Format
Multi Format
In the meantime, I've never heard anyone say a Xenar is a bad lens.

Well I’m glad about that. I really got lucky finding this camera when I did. I was close to spending $400 at the local camera shop for the same model. Granted that one did have the rangefinder on it but the one I got for $100 included a focusing loupe, filters, six film holders and three boxes of film.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,275
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom