Sirius Glass
Subscriber
I would like Kodak UltraColor and Kodak VividColor to come back in 135 and 120. Generally I do not think about what might come, I prefer to keep my sanity.
Can't say I'd agree on the return of VC films - I think Ektar does the same sort of thing better.
If Fuji want to reintroduce anything, they could bring back a 120 format Superia. Never been terribly keen on their pro neg films - they try too hard to be 'neutral' under too many conditions, & then distort certain specific colours in ways that take more effort to correct.
Something relatively easy to re-manufacture, but probably way too low market demand (unless Adox are feeling particularly quixotic) would be a Pan-Matrix film for dye transfer prints from colour negs.
Just fot the records, I tried to say Portra 400 NC.but I miss the saturation of Porta 160 VC and the soft touch of 400 VC.
Generally I do not think about what might come, I prefer to keep my sanity.
Have we ever been correct in guessing a newly announced product?
I forgot on my last post that those two candidates are quite plausible. Not so many years ago (Up until 2014?) Kodak sold "Ektacolor 160" in 120. What it actually was, no idea, but it seemed to be an analog of Colorplus-Proimage in 120. I only recall seeing it on ebay for select markets in the tropics. If that is new, not really but it is more of a consumer level product and it surely was manufactured in B38.My personal wish would be for 100 foot rolls of Color Plus 35mm at a reasonable price....but that's almost as unlikely as Kodachrome. So I am going to predict that the "reintroduced" product is either Gold in 120 or Plus-X across a range of formats. The "new" film could be P3200 in 120.
Exciting times when Kodak are even considering something new. We did get Ektachrome and P3200 back....when both seemed lost causes.
No, but we aren't quitters!
Have we ever been correct in guessing a newly announced product?
We've probably hoped for some of the same things.Never! We've been miles off, especially me!![]()
Never! We've been miles off, especially me!![]()
I'm bookmarking this post, so I can gloat if it turns out to be HIEFor starters:
- Kodachrome is too complex, hard to develop, and very obsolete
- Both HIE and Ektachrome IR were financed by the Defense Department as a National Treasure to that it would be available for the Intelligence Community.
I'm bookmarking this post, so I can gloat if it turns out to be HIE.
So will I. I am down to two rolls.
It is clear that we have very different tastes on color films. Ektar is by no means an honorable substitute of Portra 160NC for me, I tried it twice and I gave up. Seems to work well only in very particular conditions, for the rest I get unreal tones and saturation that never happen with any Portra film. Not my cup of tea.
Just fot the records, I tried to say Portra 400 NC.
It's the film I'm pulling for.I'm bookmarking this post, so I can gloat if it turns out to be HIE.
BW400CN?
Not that I'm looking for this.
Does Ilford's XP2 super 400 sell well?
Kodak/KA wasn't afraid to release a direct competition film with P3200.
They'd need to sort the orange mask issue - Ilford made the decision to maximise XP2's compatibility with BW papers and that is probably what's helped XP2 stick around.
I'm bookmarking this post, so I can gloat if it turns out to be HIE.
That would even be greater than any Kodak film indeedT
I really miss more some Fuji color films than any of Kodak, like Reala (my most desired come back film) or 400X (best slide film ever for me).
Medium Format shooters aren't going to flock to Kodak Gold 200, it's an amateur film.
...
Medium Format shooters aren't going to flock to Kodak Gold 200, it's an amateur film.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |