Get yourself an original Pen FT, not this plastic junk.
I didn't say that you cannot get good photos from one of these plastic half-frame cameras. But if you think they're going to survive more than 20 rolls of film run through them, think again. That's why - if someone is looking for a half-frame camera, I recommend a "real" camera like a Pen FT, which is potentially going to last longer than the user. Ultimately, these cheap plastic jobs are disposables, but with a slightly longer expiration date.
Not every new camera is worth investing in, certainly not just for the fact that its new.
The writing around the lens on this AgfaPhoto camera reminds me of every "Optical Lens" camera I've ever seen.
The writing around the lens does say "50mm f5.6" which is VERY odd for a half-frame camera -- especially since they sell the same camera in a full-frame version with a 31mm f9 lens.
A 31mm would make more sense, but a 25mm would be GREAT.
Neither does it look like that to me.
On a half frame camera the "normal" lens would be between 28 - 35mm (approx)
A 50mm lens on a half frame would be the equivalent of a 70 - 75mm (approx) on a 35mm camera.
BTW I wish them all the best. Any new camera is more than welcome.
~50mm is almost certainly the effective focal length rather than the physical one
They are likely catering to a crowd that grew up with digital cameras where it is common to write the 35mm equivalent focal length on the lens.But has anyone ever seen a camera with an "effective" focal length written on the lens? 1/2 frame is the format, so the effective focal length would be whatever the actual focal length is.
They are likely catering to a crowd that grew up with digital cameras where it is common to write the 35mm equivalent focal length on the lens.
I don't think I've ever seen a digital camera lens with anything other than the actual focal length written on it, though.
Just because you haven't seen them, don't mean they are not there. For example, the Minolta A1, A2 & A200 digital cameras have a great 7.2-50mm zoom but the zoom scale is only marked 28-200mm.
Admittedly, it does add (Equiv). I vaguely remember that this was fairly common back when digital cameras were starting to become commonly available.
At that time, they had to explain it in terms people familiar with 35mm would understand. They no longer need to do that.
It's just weird, because their other camera has the correct marked focal length. And it makes no sense to the avg buyer, because frankly they don't care about if it says 50mm, or 31, or. They'll just look through the VF and think 'ok.I bet the 50mm marking is intentional, but I have my doubts about the f5.6 marking. Wishful thinking on their part, perhaps.
And you can also see that at any place selling them!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?