New Direct Positive paper from Ilford Harman

TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Tide Out !

A
Tide Out !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,892
Messages
2,782,663
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
0

Peter Schrager

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
4,162
Location
fairfield co
Format
Large Format
Patrick- thank you for the info as your images make it tempting to want to try this....congrats on being at Photokina as u deserve it!!
Best, Peter
 

timeUnit

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
590
Location
Göteborg, Sw
Format
Multi Format
PLynch,

the images look great! Are you pre-exposing the paper like Harman recommends, or is this "straight"? I just ordererd a few packs of the RC paper, and I will try it with lith developer when time permits. The whole idea of making one of a kind paper prints is really exiting. I might even try it in my wet plate camera, when it's too cold to use WP chemistry outside in Sweden. Which will be very soon... :sad:
 

PLynch

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
19
Location
Lexington, N
Format
Pinhole
I have not pre flashed the paper yet. I have never liked the results when experimenting with this in the past. Although it has been a number of years. I have read The Camera, The Negative and The Print. All excellent. I have also recently become aware of another book that looks to be an excellent source of information. Way Beyond Monochrome.
 

Chazzy

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
2,942
Location
South Bend,
Format
Multi Format
I have not pre flashed the paper yet. I have never liked the results when experimenting with this in the past. Although it has been a number of years. I have read The Camera, The Negative and The Print. All excellent. I have also recently become aware of another book that looks to be an excellent source of information. Way Beyond Monochrome.

Never heard of it. :smile:

Just kidding, Ralph.
 

PLynch

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
19
Location
Lexington, N
Format
Pinhole
Yes! that is so great. Thanks for all your help. If I ever get there I'm glad you'll be there already to greet me.
Speaking of being there. Your going to be at Photokina demonstrating right? Take pictures....
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,654
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Yes! that is so great. Thanks for all your help. If I ever get there I'm glad you'll be there already to greet me.
Speaking of being there. Your going to be at Photokina demonstrating right? Take pictures....

Oh yes, I'll be there.
 

PLynch

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
19
Location
Lexington, N
Format
Pinhole
Has anyone dry mounted the Harman fibre base direct positive yet? Can't seem to get it to stick to matte board when anything else will.
 

PLynch

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
19
Location
Lexington, N
Format
Pinhole
Update on mounting.
Used colourmount. 250º for 1:45. Seemed a bit long and hot but I don't have very much experience with dry mounting fibre paper. I don't think I would try that time and temp on RC. The prints mounted fine once we cranked everything up a bit. Also, I am using 6-ply board. Not sure how much a difference that makes. If anyone else mounts this paper I would like to know how it goes for you.

I think it looks great dry mounted and matted with 6-ply cotton board.
 

PLynch

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
19
Location
Lexington, N
Format
Pinhole
Mounted the rest of my prints today. Clearly I just needed some experience with doing this after NOT for many years. Nothing cooked at 250º and they came out nice. Shipped six out for PHOTOKINA! on Saturday. Wish I could go but I am happy my prints are making it.
OK that's three in a row. It's Someone else s turn now.
 

gbmcinephoto

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2010
Messages
2
Location
a small Scot
Format
Medium Format
I want this paper so bad!

This is SO great! I'm teaching a pinhole class to some young people later this year and this paper is going to be pretty spectacular!
 

timeUnit

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
590
Location
Göteborg, Sw
Format
Multi Format
Too big!!!

:sad:

I just tried to load a few 4x5 inch film holders with this paper and it does not fit. The paper is about 1,5 millimeter larger on both sides compared to 4x5 inch film.

I thought I was going crazy so I tried it in another holder: same problem. I've compared the 4x5 inch Harman DPP to both Kodak 160NC 4x5 inch film and Efke 4x5 inch film (both of which fit perfectly in all my holders) and the DPP is larger on both sides.

Have I received a faulty batch? Is this paper not supposed to fit in a regular 4x5 inch holder?

Thanks!
 

PLynch

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
19
Location
Lexington, N
Format
Pinhole
Argh... I hear you. They make a 4x5 size. Sadly 4x5 film holders are not 4x5.
They also make a 3.9X4.9 size. This is what you need to fit the 4x5 film holders.

If you have a red safelight you could trim it down in the darkroom fairly easy. Just take care not to scratch them.
 

timeUnit

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
590
Location
Göteborg, Sw
Format
Multi Format
I guess that's true.

Very clever of the Ilford/Harman people to suddenly change the nomenclature of their own products. ALL 4x5 inch FILM on their site is labelled: 4x5 inch / 10.2 x 12.7 cm. This film fits in a 4x5 inch holder. The pack of DPP I have here says "4x5 inch / 10.2 x 12.7 cm". This is BIGGER than the "other" 4x5 inches Ilford have.

What is the point of even making a 4x5 inch size that does NOT fit in 4x5 in holder? And what is the point of making a 3.9x4.9 size only in FIBER? Why is there NO INFO on the Ilford photo site mentioning this difference in size?

I was very much looking forward to using this interesting and innovative product, but this pisses me off.

What's next? 120-film that only fits Hasselblad cameras?
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,654
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
I guess that's true.

Very clever of the Ilford/Harman people to suddenly change the nomenclature of their own products. ALL 4x5 inch FILM on their site is labelled: 4x5 inch / 10.2 x 12.7 cm. This film fits in a 4x5 inch holder. The pack of DPP I have here says "4x5 inch / 10.2 x 12.7 cm". This is BIGGER than the "other" 4x5 inches Ilford have.

What is the point of even making a 4x5 inch size that does NOT fit in 4x5 in holder? And what is the point of making a 3.9x4.9 size only in FIBER? Why is there NO INFO on the Ilford photo site mentioning this difference in size?

I was very much looking forward to using this interesting and innovative product, but this pisses me off.

What's next? 120-film that only fits Hasselblad cameras?

I think we need Ilford to explain this!
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I guess that's true.

Very clever of the Ilford/Harman people to suddenly change the nomenclature of their own products.

Did they really change nomenclature?
-) Films (intended for use in holders) are designated with nominal size
-) Papers are designated with true size

With this paper being inbetween in use that system is confusing (and would need clarifiication).
 

timeUnit

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2005
Messages
590
Location
Göteborg, Sw
Format
Multi Format
It would be pretty fantastic if all these papers failed to fit their designated holders. Perhaps Ilford could offer a custom made cutting machine that crops that extra 1.5 mm? :wink:
 

PLynch

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
19
Location
Lexington, N
Format
Pinhole
I posted this in the Paper Positives group but because there is only 6 people in the group (HINT) I am posting again here.
I received a very exciting e-mail from Harman today.
The direct positive paper has been being made in standard paper sizes. Unfortunately this is taking some photographers buy surprise. Being a direct positive paper it may very well end up in a film back and not an enlarger easel. The film back sizes are a bit smaller than standard paper sizes. Harman has recognized this and is modifying the product size.

Here is a section from the e-maili I received.

We have become increasingly aware since the launch of this product that we have rather perplexed the Analogue Photographic Community by producing 4 x 5" Direct Positive Paper at 'true' size, ie. paper ISO standards. We have therefore taken the decision to change ALL the sizes of Direct Positive Paper to ISO standard sheet film sizes for future production batches - this will effectively reduce the size of the paper very slightly in both dimensions.

It will take a little time for this adjustment to filter through to all the sizes in the range, however new stocks of 4 x 5" RC paper are in production as we speak and so all future customer orders will be supplied with resized paper. We will apply this change to all sizes of Direct Positive Paper and will refer to the 'nominal' size in inches and show the actual metric size alongside. We will of course clearly communicate the change on our websites


From what I understand DP paper should also be available for US dealers to obtain. So hopefully soon we will be able to order from B&H or your other favorite dealer.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom