Very nice Paul. How was the front lit to even up the light?
That would be tricky enough with film, you did very well to get even lighting. Do you have any trick with UV metering? or is it a bit of trial and error?A softbox (compact fluorescents) was used as a generous fill light: wet plate is reknowned for needing a lot of artificial light to fill daylit scenes. It’s about the lack of UV that fluorescents generate.
Glad you like this, thanks!
That would be tricky enough with film, you did very well to get even lighting. Do you have any trick with UV metering? or is it a bit of trial and error?
February 23, 2019: Tulips #5
Wet plate collodion image on glass, 5X7 inches, using a Voigtlander f3 (approx) lens, circa 1852.
View attachment 218117
Wow, that’s beautiful!
Another great image, thank you!The beauty of brick ... I’ve always had a soft spot for brick – it makes me think of the elegance of times gone by.
View attachment 218224
FUJI GA645Wi - EBC Fujinon 45mm f/4 - Kodak 400TX
A crop is legal, great post thank you!!Beauty of natures water.
Ok lets give this a try: Cropped detail shot @ Grasshopper Point, first rapid, from the full negative shown below.
This is the one we would like to enter, but not sure if that is legitimate, as its not the full negative.
View attachment 218235
Here is the full negative. Lomo 800 120 film. Shot @ f32 @100 in a converted 1914 Kodak Brownie from Post Card Film to 120.
View attachment 218238
February 23, 2019: Tulips #5
Wet plate collodion image on glass, 5X7 inches, using a Voigtlander f3 (approx) lens, circa 1852.
View attachment 218117
I must have missed this one - can't say how much I love it - excellent photograph, Paul!
Time to choose my Favorite, I must say all images are beautiful, here we go!!!
2e place (and maybe 1e !!!!) is AWTY with Beautiful Aye!
1e place is Paul (Paulbarden) with his superb wet plate collodion on glass Tulips 5, congratulations both! BUT……. Pauls is a member and NOT a subscriber.
According the Monthly Shooting Assignment ("MSA") Guidelines section 5 there is a very simpel solution:
(5) If the "winner" is a non-subscriber they won't be able to review entries that are uploaded only to the MSA gallery, so they really cannot be asked to judge all the entries there. For that reason, the photographer choosing the theme and judging subsequent entries needs to be an APUG subscriber. To accomplish that, the following will happen if the new "winner" is not a subscriber:
a) the current judge may, but shall not be required to give the "winner" the opportunity to promptly (within 2 days) subscribe, in which case the "winner" will be the one who chooses the theme and judges the coming entries, in order to choose the next "winner";
So Paul if you are the 6th March a subscriber would be perfect, you may start the next assignment after subscribing.
If not (WE HOPE YOU ARE THE 6th!!!!) then may AWTY starts a new assignment on the 7th March. Thanks all!
I too will say "thank you" to the generous benefactor - whoever you might be!
It certainly makes my job as "mini-moderator" of this sub-forum much simpler!
I look forward to what Paul comes up with as the next theme.
Congrats to Paul and Paul! Two beautiful photographs - this was a smart decision, Bertus.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?