Mamiya 645 normal macrolens

Branches

A
Branches

  • 5
  • 0
  • 50
St. Clair Beach Solitude

D
St. Clair Beach Solitude

  • 10
  • 3
  • 151
Reach for the sky

H
Reach for the sky

  • 4
  • 4
  • 187
Agawa Canyon

A
Agawa Canyon

  • 4
  • 3
  • 228

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,892
Messages
2,782,652
Members
99,742
Latest member
lekhaiya
Recent bookmarks
0

ksa66

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
37
Format
35mm
Im thinking about to replace my normal-lens 80mm f2.8 whith an 80mm f4 macro. Is that macrolens equally good and as sharp at infinity? I shoot landscapes mostly but like to take closeups sometimes.
Want to travel lite but also have Mamiya 45mm and zoom105-210mm lenses to carry. So another lens like 120mm f4 macro is out of the question i think. I shoot slides, mostly velvia for slideshows.

In 35mm one of my favorite lenses are micro-nikkor 55mm f2.8. Extremly sharp lens at all distances, but more prone to flare and more vignetting at same aperture than nikkor 50mm f1.8.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,998
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
My 80mm f/4 macro "N" is my most recent acquisition, and I like it a lot.

I've shot it at a variety of distances, and find it performs very well.

The downsides of the lens are minor, but worth considering:

1) it is bigger and heavier than the 80mm f/2.8 version, and takes bigger (67mm) filters and lens caps;
2) as a macro lens, it has a very long focus "throw" - it may, therefore, be less suitable for quick action or weddings; and
3) it is a bit more expensive.

I deal with all the above by having a 110mm f/2.8 as an alternate.

The images below were shot on Ektachrome E100G and then scanned (medium resolution) by a lab. I then re-sized all the files up to a size suitable for 12" x 16" RA4 prints. For APUG, I re-sized the attachments to fit within the site's restrictions.

Hope this helps.
 

Attachments

  • 01a-2012-11-27-ACER.jpg
    01a-2012-11-27-ACER.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 89
  • 02a-2012-11-27-ACER.jpg
    02a-2012-11-27-ACER.jpg
    631.2 KB · Views: 82

jjphoto

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
402
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Multi Format
I haven't used the 80/4, so no comments re it. But, if you can get a macro adapter for the M645 then maybe that would be a better option, cheaper, lighter and you get to keep using the 80/2.8 which is excellent.
 

revdocjim

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
357
Location
Tokyo
Format
Multi Format
By "macro adapter" do you mean the auto ext. rings?
There is also a macro spacer that is designed to be used with the 80/4 macro lens and giving it 1:1 magnification but I've never tried to attach it to a different lens. Not even sure if you can...
 
OP
OP

ksa66

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
37
Format
35mm
Thanks Matt! Il go for that lens. Used Mamiya 645 manual-focus lenses are very low price these days. Extension rings is a mess to work whith. And never as sharp as an real macrolens whith floating elements.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom