I went with a 501c and never regretted it.I have always wanted one and now I can't get it out of my head. I have been looking for one in my price range of $850 but most are more. What should I be checking if I do find one? Should I stay away from the 500C?
i regret not buying that 40mm cf fle and 350 that passed under my nose a few years ago for little money... i also had the chance to buy another 501cm but it was yellow...
Recently I purchased a 500c but all pieces by themselves. Total spent was about around $650. The body has some usage marks in the leatherette mainly around the WLF area. The back is one of the original versions with the peep hole. The lens was purchased from Roberts with a 6 month warranty--but it was listed in 96% condition--it is super clean and works perfectly. Each time I purchased something I asked plenty of questions and crossed my fingers they arrived as advertised. So far, around 8 rolls through it and its running great. It's a camera to use for fun. If it jams like some folks think is possible I'll think about sending it in.
I own a 501C and I love it. Changing the film is easy and it's really a nice camera. The only thing I wasn't crazy about was the waist level finder. I picked up a PM45 (w/ built in diopter) and everything has been great. I shoot in environments with a lot of water and the camera has held up well. Accessory's are very expensive so choose a kit that has what you want already in it.
If you go with an older model, I would *highly* recommend budgeting for an Acute Matte D screen too, as they are incredibly bright and clear. That screen (along with the gliding mirror) is one of the major reasons I went with a 501CM. The viewfinder in my Pentax 6x7 MLU is very dim in comparison, and is quite difficult to precisely focus with using slower lenses and/or in dark conditions. Not so with the Acute Matte D. Mine also has a central rangefinder patch, which is a real boon for achieving critical focus.
Secondly, although it makes the whole setup heavier and bulkier I would also recommend a prism of some kind, as it really helps with critical composition & focus, and also protects the focusing screen (I personally never got on very well with the WLF). A 45 degree prism is most useful hand-held; I went with the unmetered PM45 as it is far cheaper than the metered PME45 (and I use a Sekonic L-758 DR to meter anyway). A 90 degree prism is generally better on a tripod.
In fact I have never felt the need for the 90 degree prism and most will agree that the 45 degree prism is better on the tripod than the 90 degree prism. The 90 degree prism interferes with some film backs including the Polaroid and with some of the digital backs.
PME45 with an Acute Matte D is a very nice combination. While it is nice to be able add a metered prism and hand grip to the camera it does change the camera into to a heavy package approaching Speed Graphic weight. OK, maybe a little exaggeration, but you get the point.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?