Let's discuss MANUAL-FOCUS ONLY, THIRD PARTY ONLY, Super-Wide-Angle Lenses

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,708
Messages
2,779,632
Members
99,684
Latest member
delahp
Recent bookmarks
0

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
@lxdude post scriptum

The 28/3.5 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar and the 35/3.5 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar are superb lenses.

They were so good that Pentax used the same optical design, scaled-up, for their 55/3.5 and 75/4.5 lenses on the Pentax 6x7 system.

Thiis is somewhat comical, because both are petite, compact and light lenses on the M42 system.

However, when you "scale up" the 28/3.5 to a 55/3.5 (that covers 6x7), you end up with a lens that weights 920g and has a 100mm filter diameter(!)

The 35/3.5 scaled up to a 75/4.5 of 600g and 82mm filter size. The optical system of this lens was so good that Pentax basically produced the same lens (optically-wise) from 1969 until the 1990s.

The 200/4 is more or less a scaled-up 135/3.5 SMCT, and I'm sure other lenses in the 6x7 lineup also have some relationship to M42 lenses.
 

Kodachromeguy

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Messages
2,052
Location
Olympia, Washington
Format
Multi Format
The 28/3.5 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar and the 35/3.5 Super-Multi-Coated Takumar are superb lenses.

I agree. The 28 ƒ/3.5 is a remarkable performer and is compact:


The 35 (in my case a Super-Takumar) is also tiny and fun to use:

https://worldofdecay.blogspot.com/2017/07/country-stores-17-tomato-place-vicksburg.html

These Takumar lenses are still inexpensive, a bargain compared to many other brands. And they appear to age well. Buy now while you can.
 

Kodachromeguy

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Messages
2,052
Location
Olympia, Washington
Format
Multi Format
Sometimes I think of selling all my Canon and Nikon lenses and have all Takumars. Then I remember that some lenses don't exist in Takumar guise, like my 28/2.0, my shift lenses, my Canon Tilt-Shift, my FD 50/1.2, my FD 35/2.0 concave, and my FD 24/2.8.
Years ago, you could buy the Schneider PA-Curtagon lens with different mounts, including thread 42mm. But is must be hard to find now.

https://lens-db.com/schneider-kreuznach-pa-curtagon-35mm-f4/

I have a seldom-used Olympus 35mm ƒ/2.8 shift lens. I wish there was a practical way to use it on my Spotmatic, but the logical path is to buy a cheap OM body.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,338
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I occasionally use the Nikon 28mm shift lens. No tilting done to my Nikon cameras.
 

ts1000

Member
Joined
May 22, 2020
Messages
102
Location
NC, RTP
Format
Multi Format
I can't claim it's the same lens, but it might be. I have a Vivitar 21mm f3.8 (72mm thread) -- made by Tokina. From the Soligor serial # in the photo, that one was made by Tokina as well. Maybe you got a bad one -- or maybe we have different standards. Mine has a removable Vivitar mount (T4?) and works great. Really focuses close -- one foot -- and has a long 270 degree focusing throw.

For what it is worth, my somewhat negative feedback on this lens, mirrors this review
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom