I see quite a lot of bad talk about Selenium from various places, but no one here is making their own Selenium toners out of Se powder, so I'd say it's fairly hyped in the grand scheme of things.
Check out the KRST
MSDS lately?
Weight % Components - (CAS-No.)
55-60 Water (7732-18-5)
25-30 Ammonium thiosulphate (7783-18-8)
10-15 Sodium sulphite (7757-83-7)
1-5 Selenious acid, disodium salt (10102-18-8)
1-5% sodium selenite, that one dilutes a further 10-20 times (working solution) down to .05-.25% total Na2O3Se per volume of toner used. Let's just say that's 2.5-5.0g per 1000ml of water (I know, it's not exact) and one has their hands in it. Does one really believe they're magically absorbing all of this selenium into the body without a: the toner becoming useless, b: noticing quite quickly with common symptoms of selenium overdose? My only hand contact with working solution KRST is when I pull the print out of the toner - the rest of the time I'm just doing tray rocking. It's not exactly on the list of substances where cumulative exposure is a risk either - seeing as it's a natural mineral we all ingest. Granted, garlic, a natural selenium source, contains probably a 1,000,000 times less Se than 2.5g of Se, but I'm not *eating* my selenium toner.
Developer I use tongs just to avoid the potential for metol sensitization - but switch to fingers if print size is large.
Want a good time? Just mix some potassium ferricyanide bleach with an extremely strong acid (maybe glacial acetic acid concentrate will fit the bill). Liberation from the Fe should bring a nice almond scent to the darkroom and accompanying funeral. Also want a good time? Pour gasoline onto the darkroom floor and smoke a pack of Marlboros while waiting for the eventual ignition.
These two examples are thrown out there because they're both stupid careless acts that would take *effort* to achieve a bad outcome in. Just because something has the *potential* of being dangerous if misused - doesn't mean it's inherently dangerous when used appropriately.