johnha
Member
I did change the batteries and keep a lens cap on the lens so I think something is amiss, unless the new batteries I installed were duds. I'll check out Eric, thanks.
Check the battery has been installed the right way round - it is easy to do and different Pentax cameras require different polarities.
As mentioned, the K1000 was more 'feature light' than 'less well built', even after the switch to plastic top & bottom plates (and therefore lighter weight), they were still very well built cameras. Even the late ones from the late '80s were still the best built camera you could buy for less than £200 (many wondered how Pentax managed to keep that price down for a mechanical SLR).
The lack of DoF wouldn't really worry me (only really useful for visualising the effect of some filters/masks in such a small format), the lack of a self-timer significantly reduces the complexity of the shutter release mechanism, and 40-50 years down the road, means it's something that can't jam the shutter if it breaks (which I've seen happen on other similar cameras). As for the KM, KX comparison, the KX is a really well specified camera (and I prefer it to an MX), but almost all K1000s are younger than almost all KM/KXs. Many K1000s have been heavily abused and still keep clicking, however many haven't and are now only 30 years old (as opposed to 45).