Kodalith Ortho film question

What is this?

D
What is this?

  • 3
  • 9
  • 94
On the edge of town.

A
On the edge of town.

  • 7
  • 6
  • 186
Peaceful

D
Peaceful

  • 2
  • 12
  • 342
Cycling with wife #2

D
Cycling with wife #2

  • 1
  • 3
  • 126

Forum statistics

Threads
198,289
Messages
2,772,390
Members
99,592
Latest member
gregmulvey
Recent bookmarks
0

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,250
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
I've used Rodinal at 1:100 for microfilms and got useful grayscale. Not the rich tonality of an ISO 100 conventional film, but definitely a range of gray. I don't recall the time I used, but most likely I used my usual 3 minute agitation cycle, which improves film speed (compared to same developer in conventional agitation) while keeping contrast from blowing out.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,865
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Back in 2002, I rescued 10, 100 sheet boxes of 4x5, and 2, 100 sheet boxes of 8x10, that were tossed by the then yearbook teacher, when they switched over to digital. Expiry dates from '95 to '98. Perhaps it's time to start playing around with it...I'll mix up some POTA. Hopefully the fog isn't too bad 🙂
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2017
Messages
804
Location
Michigan, United States
Format
Multi Format
I've used Rodinal at 1:100 for microfilms and got useful grayscale. Not the rich tonality of an ISO 100 conventional film, but definitely a range of gray. I don't recall the time I used, but most likely I used my usual 3 minute agitation cycle, which improves film speed (compared to same developer in conventional agitation) while keeping contrast from blowing out.

so you're saying about 3 minutes if I use Rodinal 1:100?
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,250
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,250
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
At 1:100, you'll get nothing after 3 minutes. 40 minutes - maybe 30.

With microfilm (Imagelink from around 2000) I recall my time being around fifteen minutes with agitation every 3rd minute, but I'd have to dig in the Wayback Machine (if it's back up) or check my personal copy of my dev records to be sure.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,544
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
With microfilm (Imagelink from around 2000) I recall my time being around fifteen minutes with agitation every 3rd minute, but I'd have to dig in the Wayback Machine (if it's back up) or check my personal copy of my dev records to be sure.

At 1:100, the Rodinal may be spent by 15 minutes.

thinking about trying ISO 10

You'll get better results photographing lower contrast scenes. Makes for slower shutter speeds, but helps keep highlights from zooming to max density.
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,250
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
At 1:100, the Rodinal may be spent by 15 minutes.

Certainly possible, though I was processing 20-24 inch Minolta 16 rolls in not much over two ounces of developer (in my homemade low volume tank) -- I used a time I found online, applied my usual "+40% time, agitate every third minute" to it, and then decided Caffenol LC+C gave better results. In fact, that's probably what I'll try when I finally find a way to expose the ortho halftone film I have on hand (it won't fit a 4x5 film holder, so I have to either find a way to cut it down or come up with another way to hold it in the camera).
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2023
Messages
454
Location
Cleveland
Format
35mm
Hello,

So I found a bulk loader in my college darkroom with the label "Kodalith Ortho loaded 18/3/2015". Obviously, I want to shoot a roll and develop it, but since it's an old film, I am wondering what ISO I should shoot it at. I actually don't even know what the original ISO rating was. Is there a specific developer that is better for this film?
If anyone has any knowledge about this particular film and its development.


Thanks,
Henry

This is a litho film, not continuous tone. It was used for line work, where only black and white were desired. It would be extremely difficult to get anything like normal negatives from it.
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,603
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
Back in the 1960s(?) I used Kodalith sheet film. But I wanted everything reduced to black or clear and used the Kodalith developer because I was making etched parts and printed circuit boards.

(Gad -- sitting here today that seems like the late Bronze Age!!!)
 

Donald Qualls

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 19, 2005
Messages
12,250
Location
North Carolina
Format
Multi Format
When we did posterizing in my high school photography class, we developed the Kodalith in Dektol at print strength (1+2 as I recall, small school and economy was king; we never printed enough in one session to exhaust the print developer) for two or three minutes, same as a print. That got us just a soft edge between the solid black and clear film. I think we also developed sometimes in film strength (1+9) for a similar time to get gray scale, but that's been 50+ years...
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom