Kodak Reintroduces Ektachrome.

$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 1
  • 0
  • 20
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 89
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 1
  • 81
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 82
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 2
  • 79

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,794
Messages
2,780,931
Members
99,705
Latest member
Hey_You
Recent bookmarks
0

Hal Reiser

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2008
Messages
78
Location
Milepost 30
Format
Medium Format
Got a notice from B&H this morning that E100G is back in stock at $12.99 per roll. I immediately purchased four rolls.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Does think/know if there is a blue cast added to Ektachrome to compensate for tungsten projection bulbs? I am gearing up to scan slides (old Kodachromes, Ektachromes, Agfa, GAF, etc.) and wonder if this is universal. My light source is tungsten. I will use a Fuji XT-2, so no problem there, but am considering using film to copy some of the most precious slides also. I have a Durst copier with dichroic head, so I could also dial in some compensating color (it also has a 4"x4" filter drawer so I could add a compensating filter too).
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,902
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Halogen projection bulbs are very close to a daylight source when it comes to projecting an image. No blue necessary.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Greg Heath

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
591
Location
Racine, Wisc
Format
Medium Format
EA0B25F3-1A3E-46D0-A551-400EDB35F250.jpeg
Not to be a "wet blanket" but one has to wonder -- given that the availability of E6 processing has been plummeting over the years, will this work? I know I have pretty much given up on color film as getting it processed takes too long and costs a lot, especially transparencies. The last roll of 120 Fuji I had done took me three weeks to get back from a small local chain that does it in house but apparently waits until they have a pile to do. I understand that thinking, but I found it discouraging.

None the less, if they are seeing the sales potential to make the move, hey -- go for it!


Why dont you just do it at home ? I use my Sansaire Sous Vide and it works out everytime. Chems are like $35.
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,312
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
Does think/know if there is a blue cast added to Ektachrome to compensate for tungsten projection bulbs? I am gearing up to scan slides (old Kodachromes, Ektachromes, Agfa, GAF, etc.) and wonder if this is universal.

the film is intended to give plain colour, although Ektachrome is Known to be a touch blue. I doubt if the bias is intended mind you.

SOME Motion Picture PRINTS used to be made with a different colour balance to be used where ARC Lamps, particularly Xenon Arcs were in use. That change too away some blue to make up for the higher colour temperature of the Arc light.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,902
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Your eyes adapt! This is virtually unrelated to illumination.

PE

I think the key there is there is no ambient light to confuse the eyes. I have heard this also. Some people are saying Kodachrome specifically has a blue tint added, I wondered if it were universal among slide films. Fortunately the Durst slide copier has a filter drawer so if I choose to copy film-film, I can at least color balance (given that likely the slides themselves may not do the balancing for you).
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,902
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
No normal slide film has an intentional colour tint.
Thousands of sides viewed by holding them up and looking through them tell me that.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
There is no tint added. There is a UV filter in all color films though.

PE

Thanks. Lot's of internet chatter, but nothing to back it up from Kodak or any other company.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Halogen projection bulbs are very close to a daylight source when it comes to projecting an image. No blue necessary.
The maximum colour temperature of a halogen bulb is only about 3400K.
If at projection there is barely daylight, or other light, then there is nothing the projected image to correspond to, and colour temperature of a projection lamp within limits is not of effect. In this respect you are right.
 

brianmquinn

Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
687
Location
Cincinnati O
Format
Medium Format
Often a projector will have an element of heat adsorbing glass between the bulb and film. This glass a light bluish green most of the time so I would expect that the color temperature of the light that reaches the film would differ from the 3400K that the bulb puts out.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Ok. Got the slide copying going on the Durst. I am using an e-Komura 75mm enlarging lens (with a Fuji XT-2, APS-C). I can get full frame easily. I dial in 120 C + 110 M, and I get pretty good color balance. For 1948 Kodachrome I need another white balance correction in ON1, but with 1975 Kodachrome, the white balance just requires a tweak. The white balance calculated temperature numbers between the two are quite different, but I am using the same color-head correction for now. I will work with that. I may not need the C+M correction for the 1975 Kodachrome, which is in much better condition than the 1948 (yellow shift). I use the histogram to help determine exposure then shoot RAW. Here is an example of the 1975 Kodachrome:

Ducks_1975_1k.jpg


EDIT: For sure the Durst CC was not required for the 1975 Kodachrome. The correction I made only corrected the yellow color shift in the 1948 Kodachrome slides. Here is an uncorrected and looks much closer to the original (by eye):

ducks_NoDurst_CC1k.jpg


Typical color for the white of the ceramic duck is R240 G236 B235 without any digital constraints on highlights, etc. The light in the background does look yellow/red on the slide (like late afternoon light perhaps).
 
Last edited:

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,312
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
KOdachrome used to often require a different colour filter pack when making duplicate slides I am told. Probably since the dyes are different, they look more different to the duplicating film than they do to the eye.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
KOdachrome used to often require a different colour filter pack when making duplicate slides I am told. Probably since the dyes are different, they look more different to the duplicating film than they do to the eye.

That is what I heard. I just color balanced by eye on the rear LCD. Auto white balance was not doing much for me for some reason. It worked pretty well.
 

laser

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Messages
1,052
Format
4x5 Format
The specific Kodachrome spectral dye density and Ektachrome spectral sensitivity and resulting dye densities creates the need for filters when making dupes. The analysis is called a print-through. This is a spectral analysis. The characteristics are cascaded to determine the best filter pack. Modifyingthe filter pack doesn't give the best possible dupe from Kodachrome. So Kodak had a special Ektachrome dupe film, Type K that had spectral sensitivity and image dyes to optimize duplication of Kodachrome (K-14) Film on to a E-6 dupe film.

Bob Shanebrook www.makingKODAKfilm.com
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,902
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Are you saying that colour transparency film isn't simple and easy? :whistling::wink::wondering:
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,417
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The specific Kodachrome spectral dye density and Ektachrome spectral sensitivity and resulting dye densities creates the need for filters when making dupes. The analysis is called a print-through. This is a spectral analysis. The characteristics are cascaded to determine the best filter pack. Modifyingthe filter pack doesn't give the best possible dupe from Kodachrome. So Kodak had a special Ektachrome dupe film, Type K that had spectral sensitivity and image dyes to optimize duplication of Kodachrome (K-14) Film on to a E-6 dupe film.

Bob Shanebrook www.makingKODAKfilm.com

Glad to see your book is back in print!
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,312
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
Everything Ektachrome seems to be elusive, this thread has an ad from Amazon today with a "Vintage EKTACHROME Film Logo T-shirt" of course i click on it, and find it does not ship to Canada. :sad:
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom