Agree, sell it in the lomo store and people would probably eat it up...for a healthy profit no doubt
.. My concern is it will turn out to be a fad...
Hula Hoops take terrible photographs too, but they can be slimming if used regularly. I cannot say the same for LOMO.
Lomo is very slimming...to my wallet!
Hula Hoops take terrible photographs too, but they can be slimming if used regularly.
Oh yeah if we could somehow make film photography addictive!
... and then some ladies start an anti-photography league ...
If kodak was a solid Digital player today (R&D, sensors, Cameras...), they would have kept producing film even if it would be losing money just for the sake of being present in the market.
Kodak as a succesful digital company would have been the key to keeping film alive. As it is now, even if their film division is making a small profit, it is no guarantee of survival.
Fuji is a successful player in digital, and they aren't keeping around any spare emulsions. Each emulsion has to pull its own weight, and reformulations are weighed against the return profit. Witness the demise of Acros 400 in 120. Companies only go for a loss in a product if it promises a future ROI. That's why Microsoft keeps the lights on for MSNBC. When a product needs to be reformulated in a shrinking market, there is very little chance for that product's continued manufacture.
What's that saying " rearranging deckchairs on deck of the Titanic".
You obviously did not read this entire thread!
PE
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?