In that interview
"Approving the RAA was the right thing to do. The alternative was insolvency of the employer..."
You need to be careful of this wording, because it appears to me that it is the Pension Plan itself that is the sponsoring "employer", not Kodak Alaris.
That impression flows from:
"The trustees acquired a number of businesses from Eastman Kodak, grouped under the name of Kodak Alaris. As a result, the scheme’s sponsoring employer is a special purpose company with no trading assets, with Kodak Alaris instead being an asset of the scheme. "
The continued existence and operation of Kodak Alaris is implied by:
"Despite the UK scheme entering the PPF, Kodak Alaris continues to support a number of smaller DB schemes in Germany and around the world. The smaller DB global schemes are not related to the KPP2 scheme, which is the sole shareholder of Kodak Alaris, whereas Kodak Alaris is the sponsoring employer of the smaller DB schemes."
I take it that DB means Defined Benefit Pension.