Kodachrome

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 2
  • 0
  • 95
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 132
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 130

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,750
Messages
2,780,367
Members
99,697
Latest member
Fedia
Recent bookmarks
6
Status
Not open for further replies.

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,876
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Has there been a time warp arrive, without someone notifying me.
I’ve just acquired the last known K-Lab and I am beginning the task of restoring it. https://klablives.com/
If you are brave, I would suggest that you start your own thread about this project.
This thread can then be used to move all the viability arguments into it.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
I’ve just acquired the last known K-Lab and I am beginning the task of restoring it. https://klablives.com/

Sincerely, good luck. I understand that some (or all?) the chemicals were to be prepared by the laboratory itself (i.e. "Dwayne's") from zero. In other words, that Kodak did not give pre-packaged chemistry for the K14 process that you could simply "just mix with water" and be ready to feed it into the processor.

This increases the difficulty level.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,627
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Oh Boy. There's so many things demanding capital. IMHO this isn't one of them. I would suggest doing some serious investigating before donating money to resurrect a lovely piece of "scrap" FWIWYMMV. Best Regards to everyone. Peace :smile:
 

John Salim

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
247
Location
Southend Essex
Format
Multi Format
There's no 'fresh' Kodachrome film around now ( and certainly no control films ), so even if this gets off the ground, the very best outcome will be very poor quality results.
If they're thinking of resurrecting that Kodachrome 'look' - it just ain't gonna happen.

Looking at the video, a machine of this size ( ... and it looks bigger than the more compact K-Lab I've seen ) will need a LOT of film going through it every day just to maintain any quality.

I do understand the reasons for this, but it's doomed from the start I'm afraid.
Just like dye transfer IB Technicolor, Kodachrome is history !

John S :cry:
 

Helge

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Messages
3,938
Location
Denmark
Format
Medium Format
I’ve just acquired the last known K-Lab and I am beginning the task of restoring it. https://klablives.com/

Reviving something like Kodachrome is not as totally impossible as it may sound.
The film itself is significantly less complex than E6 film.
Clones were made by smaller manufacturers back in the day, and there was successful experiments within Kodak, to do a one layer Kodachrome.
If someone like Ferrania or Orwo did the research, that would be absolutely feasible and would give Fuji and Kodak food for thought and stiff competition.

The big problem is of course that with only one processor, that is a significant bottleneck and liability, as well as the fact that it’s not going to be inexpensive to have your film processed on those terms.
We would need more processor‘s like this, or at least with the same functionality.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,464
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
I've recently been going through some old slides, including some kodachrome from the 50's that still look good.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,530
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
Perhaps ADOX, rather than expending resources on another C-41 negative film "mission" the world definitely doesn't need, will start coating K-14 ADOXCHROME if this K-lab project succeeds.

This from someone who's pooh-poohed all the previous quixotic Kodachrome revival threads. :smile:
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,220
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
I am not an expert on any film, especially K-Chrome, but.................what is the attraction of having a processing machine, even if the chems were available, for a film that has not been made in many years.?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,876
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I am not an expert on any film, especially K-Chrome, but.................what is the attraction of having a processing machine, even if the chems were available, for a film that has not been made in many years.?
There are probably people out there like me who have unexposed Kodachrome, and either believe in the legend, or want it to be still true.
(my stash of film came along with a bunch of E6 - I've been meaning to experiment with it and black and white development for quite some time).
And just to be clear, in its time, Kodachrome was extra-ordinary, and I loved using it. I would choose to use modern Ektachrome now.
 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,519
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
I am not an expert on any film, especially K-Chrome, but.................what is the attraction of having a processing machine, even if the chems were available, for a film that has not been made in many years.?

I think sometimes people like tinkering with old machines, just like some do with a classic/old car restoration. Once the job is complete, it's on to another restoration.

In the video, the K-lab was in 2 sections on the trailer, so it would be a long machine, that (to my knowledge) is a movie film type transport for the film. If so that means a very long film leader to just thread the different tanks.

Best of luck with the project, but personally I think you would be better off throwing the money into the large hole in my back garden. :whistling:
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,220
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
There are probably people out there like me who have unexposed Kodachrome, and either believe in the legend, or want it to be still true.
(my stash of film came along with a bunch of E6 - I've been meaning to experiment with it and black and white development for quite some time).
And just to be clear, in its time, Kodachrome was extra-ordinary, and I loved using it. I would choose to use modern Ektachrome now.

I think sometimes people like tinkering with old machines, just like some do with a classic/old car restoration. Once the job is complete, it's on to another restoration.

In the video, the K-lab was in 2 sections on the trailer, so it would be a long machine, that (to my knowledge) is a movie film type transport for the film. If so that means a very long film leader to just thread the different tanks.

Best of luck with the project, but personally I think you would be better off throwing the money into the large hole in my back garden. :whistling:
10-4.....................Thank You Both :smile:
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,876
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
In the video, the K-lab was in 2 sections on the trailer, so it would be a long machine, that (to my knowledge) is a movie film type transport for the film. If so that means a very long film leader to just thread the different tanks.
About one mile of leader, followed typically by a mile of spliced together customers' films, followed by a mile of trailer.
At least for the Kodak lab Kodachrome machines in the 1970s and early 1980s.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,530
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
About one mile of leader, followed typically by a mile of spliced together customers' films, followed by a mile of trailer.
At least for the Kodak lab Kodachrome machines in the 1970s and early 1980s.
K-lab leader/trailer not anywhere near that long.

It doesn't give specific lengths, but, knowing the device's approximate dimensions, one might be able to reasonably estimate them from this document:

 

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,519
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
K-lab leader/trailer not anywhere near that long.

It doesn't give specific lengths, but, knowing the device's approximate dimensions, one might be able to reasonably estimate them from this document:


It's still a lot of leader, even with the feed magazine of 400 ft (that's about 80 36exp films approx).

Thank you for posting the Theory Guide for K-14M, interesting reading. It appears to be dated March 99.

I see the control unit is an IBM compatible PC running Windows, but what version of Windows, is it Windows NT, 95 or 2000? I think there can be big problems running such old software (even running virtual Windows 95 on a modern PC).
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
I am not an expert on any film, especially K-Chrome, but.................what is the attraction of having a processing machine, even if the chems were available, for a film that has not been made in many years.?

There are some people out there selling refrigerated K14 film like K25 or K64.

Due to not having the dyes inside, this film should keep up very well in time. Even more so if it's a low speed film.
 

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,330
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
Due to not having the dyes inside, this film should keep up very well in time. Even more so if it's a low speed film.

No, it didn't keep well. Back when Kodak processing was available I shot up some outdated K25 and it loses density and can't deliver a black and shifts to magenta
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
1,213
Location
Hawaii
Format
35mm RF
Holy crap! I just got wind o'this and have to chime in, sorry in advance if everyone else has chimed in.

First off; yay! in this modern world surely it is possible. Yay however you look at it.

2nd point and then I'll back scroll to figure out just how lost I now am;

The film is the easy part; tri-layer B&W each different wavelength plus that rem-jet baby (do we still need that?).
 

railwayman3

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
2,816
Format
35mm
No, it didn't keep well. Back when Kodak processing was available I shot up some outdated K25 and it loses density and can't deliver a black and shifts to magenta

I don't think that you can make a blanket statement about any outdated film. even Kodachrome. My understanding is that any manufacturer will guarantee the results from any of their films up to the stated expiry date, provided that the recommended storage conditions are observed. After that, you're on your own....it might be OK, but any deterioration will depend on conditions and could well even vary from batch to batch.
When Kodachrome processing finished in 2010 (2021), I used up many Kodachrome films, outdated and otherwise, the oldest being a K25 dated 1981 (29 years o/d) and all proved still fresh with no visible deterioration.
OTOH, there were some issues with Kodachrome processing in the UK by Kodak (so far as I recall back in the late 1970. or 80's ? ) with scratches, blue spots and slightly "off" colours, which was perhaps a reason that some users (including myself) switched to Agfa and particularly Fuji at that time ? I know that some photoclub friends even took to posting their pre-paid Kodachrome to one of the Kodak labs in Europe, France, Germany, Austria, etc., on the basis that the results were much better and consistent !
 
Last edited by a moderator:

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,844
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
I was just thinking that Kodak could tweak Ektachrome to have the contrast and saturation of Kodachrome and call it Kodakchrome.

You know you would buy it.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
I was just thinking that Kodak could tweak Ektachrome to have the contrast and saturation of Kodachrome and call it Kodakchrome.

You know you would buy it.

Fee fi fo fum...I smell someone taking my talking points.

I think Kodak will do that at some point. It's not every day a company has an awesome song associated with a product line.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,876
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,330
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
My understanding is that any manufacturer will guarantee the results from any of their films up to the stated expiry date, provided that the recommended storage conditions are observed.
The newest Kodachrome is now at least 13 years past its expiry date, so if you were to resurrect the processing,how would you know if the process or the film was bad if the results are not good? The odds of getting satisfactory results are dropping every day.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,876
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Status
Not open for further replies.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom