Kind of disappointed.

Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 0
  • 18
Oak

A
Oak

  • 1
  • 0
  • 21
High st

A
High st

  • 6
  • 0
  • 61
Flap

D
Flap

  • 0
  • 0
  • 26

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,216
Messages
2,788,017
Members
99,836
Latest member
HakuZLQ
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Messages
154
Location
Monterey, CA
Format
Multi Format
Every lens, like a golf ball, has a sweet spot. I've found maximum sharpness on a given lens is actually between f8.0-f11.0. While manufacturers make all sorts of claims regarding sharpnes, factory techs would be inclined to say differently. I suggest you run some tests at maximum aperture, then in the mid-range and at minimum like f16 and f22.

Try this with different lenses with appropriate shading and without changing the camera position at all. Use a tripod, a cable release make; sure your camera is plumb and level to the newspaper; use a medium shutter speed like 1/125 or 250 and if you can, pre-release the shutter on each exposure; make sure the newspaper is flat against the wall and evenly illuminated. RECORD your exposure info for each frame. Use slower film, iso 100 or less processed normally.

Then take a high magnification loupe and a light box and look at the negs. Not prints. See what you've got then.

I'd lay odds that a really close analysis will reveal the sharpest f-stop won't be at the bottom or top end of the aperture ring but more in the center. There are so many variables to lens sharpness. Your new found 1.4 could have a miniscule separation of lens element(s) or coating issue, camera shake (even at 1/500th from mirror slap). I think the true key to this kind of analysis is knowing where that sweet spot lies in each of your lenses and work within the limitations of every piece of glass you shoot with.
Take it light ;>)
Mark
 

markaudacity

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
156
Location
Houston TX USA
Format
Med. Format RF
Todd, graininess can't be caused by the lens. That's dependent on the emulsion used, the amount of exposure it receives, and how it's developed.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,262
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Todd, graininess can't be caused by the lens. That's dependent on the emulsion used, the amount of exposure it receives, and how it's developed.

Not quite true ...

Graininess could be caused by the aperture or the linkages to it, if the malfunction of that aperture resulted in substantial under-exposure, or over-exposure.
 

clayne

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2008
Messages
2,764
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
Not quite true ...

Graininess could be caused by the aperture or the linkages to it, if the malfunction of that aperture resulted in substantial under-exposure, or over-exposure.

That's indirect and exceptional to the normal *control* though - hence it's unreasonable to think Todd would have accounted for that.

In normal cases the lens won't affect it.
 

TheToadMen

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
3,570
Location
Netherlands, EU
Format
Pinhole
The scanner itself may also cause "unsharpness". Do you use a film scanner and/or a film holder?
Better make an actual print of this negative to see what it will get you.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom