The replacement one you'll buy in lieu of servicing the one you already have will often need a CLA too, so it can be a zero sum game.Many cameras from the 70s still work fine, if you want to keep them alive get a CLA (even though buying another used one is currently often still cheaper).
I look forward to comparing Kentmere with my favourite FP4+
For those wondering about the difference between Kentmere films and the more expensive Ilford films, this exchange was posted on Ilford's Instagram feed today. No mention of differences in the anti-halation layer...
"what's the point when no medium format cameras are being made?"
Well...there must be several million functional medium format cameras out there. I own at least 20 myself. And given that most of mine are rather vintage, Kentmere may well end up replacing Fomapan as my film of choice except when I'm photographing gigs, light shows and fireworks.
But it's not just me. There is clearly a demand for a cheaper option in medium format B&W film. Many shops simply don't stock Foma and in the UK at least have concentrated on HP5 and FP4 in 120. Now I bet they'll stock Ketnmere too. The days of £2 rolls of 120 film are over, but there *is* now another relatively cheap option.
One factor: the price of film in 2022, and Ilford's projected costs going forward. They NEED to have a less expensive option in 120.
It would happen if Fuji brought back Neopan 1600...at least for me it would!
Ignore my previous post. I posted before seeing this thread. Sorry.
I'd prefer 220 if the truth be told, preferably Tri-X or TMY-2
"what's the point when no medium format cameras are being made?"
Well...there must be several million functional medium format cameras out there. option.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?