As I said, for me "at least three and others elsewhere" isn't even remotely equivalent to "many, many."Sal, there are at least 3 if not more here on this site and others elsewhere...
You can make a frog drunk by immersing it in wine for one minute.
I"d venture to guess that your observation applies to 99%+ of Internet bandwidth consumed. Not just this thread. Fortunately, the cost of bandwidth has declined over time.The sad thing about this thread that I see is a waste of bandwidth on the internet.
I"d venture to guess that your observation applies to 99%+ of Internet bandwidth consumed. Not just this thread. Fortunately, the cost of bandwidth has declined over time.
Hey! Kodachrome on glass plates!Sal, there are at least 3 if not more here on this site and others elsewhere.
As for Steve, he offered it as noted above, but no one took him up on it. So there it is.
Oh, and one person has coated and processed elements of Kodachrome using his home-made coating machine. That too is on this site.
PE
PE seems to imply that processing Kodachrome is not an impossible task (and that even some people achieved it on their own). He also wrote in an old post that as far as he knew, the chemicals involved in coating Kodachrome were not worse than current films made today. So what is truly the reason everybody seems to think it would be so impossible to revive except that old feeling that what was once a commercial failure should be left dead for ever?
It may as well be.ummm wait, is this the deleated thread ?
So how is the revived Ektachrome selling?they got rid of it because it did not sell well
why would resurrecting it ( which will cost $$ )
make it sell any better, even if it is a small fortune / roll ?
(Snippiti snip) ...
PE seems to imply that processing Kodachrome is not an impossible task (and that even some people achieved it on their own). He also wrote in an old post that as far as he knew, the chemicals involved in coating Kodachrome were not worse than current films made today. So what is truly the reason everybody seems to think it would be so impossible to revive except that old feeling that what was once a commercial failure should be left dead for ever?
Well said.So how is the revived Ektachrome selling?
not sure, is it even released yet ?So how is the revived Ektachrome selling?
What makes you think Kodak can execute on something so complex as Kodachrome?
I am surprised that the mere discussion of a possible revival of Kodachrome is generating such heated emotions.
I’m sorry to let you know that the ignorance is just as much on your side than mine as you have no way to know how well would Kodachrome sell if it were revived today. Based on your reasoning since vinyl discs sold miserably « at the end of their life » when CD took over, then there were no chance at all it would be sold all over again today. We both know it is unrealistic to apply that reasoning as a ganeral rule with no exception.Brazen ignorance has that effect on some.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?