I believe the subscription model came as a result of widespread bootlegging and stolen software. These are very powerful, sophisticated and complex programs that took time to develop and continue to improve. Adobe does deserve to make money from it. Not that long ago, it took a $150,000 (1980's dollars, too!) computer system in a climate-controlled room, with dedicated software to do 1/10 of what Photoshop can do today on your desktop.
Adobe sent me an email earlier this month to make sure my credit card info was up to date for renewal.
NO Customer Service when you're locked out on a weekend. I'm NOT PAYING FOR THAT!
If your time is worth nothing, switch to Linux and Gimp.
I laugh at people bitchin about Adobe while using Microsoft Windows.
There are a million reasons why a piece of software can give a user issues.
Old hardware (yes a computer older than 3 years is old) running the same windows installation it came with loaded with spy and bloatware.
I could go on, but it's not ALWAYS the software makers fault.
I do begrudge forcing the same $120 per year ($10 monthly) from EVERY user, regardless of whether it makes income for the user, or not.
Things are different in the walled garden for sure.Call your credit card company and tell them you "lost" the card and three days later you will have a new card with a new number. At the end of the billing cycle Adobe will suddenly give you a whole lot of attention.
I do not use Photo$hop, I use GIMP. On my PC laptop I use OpenOffice instead of Micro$oft Windoz; on my Mac Pro Tower I use Micro$oft Word and Excel 2008 that Apple's Time Machine brought over from my 1995 Mac in 2013 when I upgraded my Mac. You Windoz users can go cry in your Rodinal.
I never begrudged adobe the money but they have wasted My Time over their insecurity. I have spend WAY MORE MONEY on Amazon and NEVER LOG IN. No Problems.
I dumped microsoft office for security issues. They demanded a Cell Phone Number to use office. THERE IS NO CELL SERVICE HERE.
And possibly more than the OP is aware of him/herself.I have the feeling there is more to the story than we have been told.
I've been using PS since its beginnings.
Whining about the annual fee for the photo package is just juvenile imho when the very same people don't think twice about paying Starbucks prices for coffee.
My enlargers don't work well without electricity, nor does my source of running water.If you need electricity or batteries to produce a print... are you really a photographer?
My enlargers don't work well without electricity, nor does my source of running water.
Some mine their own silver, I'm sure.
Corel gets more money out of me via its pay-once model than Adobe gets out of me from its pay-every-month extortion model!
Having been in the professional software industry for nearly 10 years, I know the issue of recurring income needed to fund improvement of software products. I do not begrudge Adobe for trying to get recurring income. I do begrudge forcing the same $120 per year ($10 monthly) from EVERY user, regardless of whether it makes income for the user, or not.
Why not $1200 from a user making money from using Adobe products, $120 from a hobbyist, and $12 from a retiree?!
(or whatever nets them what they get from uniformly extorting the same amount from everyone...they can figure that out.)
40 years of $10 per month is really $11819.61 lost, if you simply assume a modest 4% annual return on money invested, rather than spent.
A level and quantity of use pricing system would be more appropriate in many ways.Why lower prices for retirees? What difference does it make whether the product is used for business? And where does the forcing and extortion come into play?
What if the product saved you a hour each month? Can you earn that $10 back with your extra hour?
"So when did using photo editing software save anyone any time?"
A level and quantity of use pricing system would be more appropriate in many ways.
As software is rented, not bought (all software, not just Adobe), the amount one pays should have some connection with one's use.
The other, somewhat tongue in cheek response that occurs to me is: "So when did using photo editing software save anyone any time?"
Personally, I like the subscription service model, but think that it should both permit reliable unconnected use and be scalable - heavy users should pay more. Something with modules that can be deactivated (for lower cost) and activated either temporarily or permanently, for flexibility.
Photoshop at its core is a graphics program that has been applied by many to photography. Its powerful graphics capabilities remain unused by most.
Due to the cost of the Adobe subscription, I mostly use Corel products, plus FastStone.
Retirees should pay double.Corel gets more money out of me via its pay-once model than Adobe gets out of me from its pay-every-month extortion model!
Having been in the professional software industry for nearly 10 years, I know the issue of recurring income needed to fund improvement of software products. I do not begrudge Adobe for trying to get recurring income. I do begrudge forcing the same $120 per year ($10 monthly) from EVERY user, regardless of whether it makes income for the user, or not.
Why not $1200 from a user making money from using Adobe products, $120 from a hobbyist, and $12 from a retiree?!
(or whatever nets them what they get from uniformly extorting the same amount from everyone...they can figure that out.)
40 years of $10 per month is really $11819.61 lost, if you simply assume a modest 4% annual return on money invested, rather than spent.
But my real question is, what makes retirees special? Why not by zip code, level of education, IQ or any other factor that might be a better indicator of available funds? I know retirees that bring in as much as my wife and I combined so why should they get a break?
hmh, I log in to Lightroom daily and PS weekly, have ever since they went to a service model.
I wont say I never had any issues, but as it is I cant remember when that was. So not very often.
Adobe sent me an email earlier this month to make sure my credit card info was up to date for renewal.
NO Customer Service when you're locked out on a weekend. I'm NOT PAYING FOR THAT!
I've never heard of a security attack, nor have I experienced one thankfully. The suite of Adobe products has worked perfectly for me from the get-go.
Photoshop is $9.99/mo where I live, and that's an absolute no-brainer for me and I'll gladly rent this software as long as it makes sense to do so. If I only used the software an hour a month it would still be worth it to enjoy the latest technology, but as it turns out I use it every day. Easy peasy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?