- Joined
- Oct 26, 2015
- Messages
- 6,743
- Format
- 35mm
We should probably take that discussion to The Lounge but I will tell you, as retired educator who taught for decades at the high school level, student achievement has very little to do with whatever fad has come down the pike be it New Math, Outcome Based Education, Common Core, etc. and EVERYTHING to do with family involvement in the child’s education. Regardless of standards or curriculum, we have, OUT OF THE SAME SCHOOL, students who achieve at high levels and go on to success at major universities and careers and some students who do not do as well. Comparing those two and asking why they achieve differently will yield answers that have nothing to do with standards.
I come from a family of educators. I agree with family involvement being the ultimate reason for success. CC however moves to put a wedge in family involvement. It is so radically different from the way my generation and generations before me were educated that it's near impossible to contribute unless I unlearn what I've learned and learn a new process from scratch.
1+3=4 yay!
Why does it = 4? 'cause it does. Count.
Nooooooo. Because if you take 3 and make it 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and then add .5 and .5 which then equals another 1 and then put it all together with Jose's apples can you draw an orange? Then that will be Four 1's which is the same as 2+2=4 being the 2 is a 1+1. Draw Argentina.
You can thank common core for that. It's bonkers, at least the mathematics part.
'We need to teach them to THINK math'
No, the kids need to learn their tables. Stop over complicating it.
I have heard those “examples” before but I never saw them in practice. There will always be some outlier that is conflated and spread across the whole field of education By those with their own agenda.
And I don’t see how standards put a wedge in families. Why shouldn’t parents have to learn new processes?
Interestingly, I looked at some of the ways they teach arithmetic today and found that I learned new stuff that made the math seem more understandable. That there was a lot of rote learning when I was a kid but without comprehending what was going on. Maybe a combination of both styles is better?
We should probably take that discussion to The Lounge but I will tell you, as retired educator who taught for decades at the high school level, student achievement has very little to do with whatever fad has come down the pike be it New Math, Outcome Based Education, Common Core, etc. and EVERYTHING to do with family involvement in the child’s education. Regardless of standards or curriculum, we have, OUT OF THE SAME SCHOOL, students who achieve at high levels and go on to success at major universities and careers and some students who do not do as well. Comparing those two and asking why they achieve differently will yield answers that have nothing to do with standards.
The curriculum looks like it was put together by a committee. It's convoluted.
It’s because they have to. The machine tells them how much change to return.
Interestingly, I looked at some of the ways they teach arithmetic today and found that I learned new stuff that made the math seem more understandable. That there was a lot of rote learning when I was a kid but without comprehending what was going on. Maybe a combination of both styles is better?
Processing in labs seems to have held so far although purchasing film has gone up. The problem is that value of currency has decreased due to inflation so everything costs more. I ate in two places recently and they cut out the free side salad with the main course. The last one wanted a 3.25% surcharge if using your credit card. So we paid cash something I hadn't done in years for a big meal. It's got to hurt the credit card companies, Maybe they'll give bigger credits if you use their card in restaurants to encourage their use.
…and assure them it's fine no matter what grade they get as long as they know the answer to the equation and they understand how they got there.
But they don;t understand why. They look quizzically and you can see their brains trying to understand how that happened, like magic.
The curriculum looks like it was put together by a committee. It's convoluted.
This supposed resurgence in Film Photography is largely a passing fad. It will eventually start to round off, die down.
The first-timers at our community darkroom hold their cellphone in one hand while agitating the film tank with the other.
Sometimes they'll bring them into the darkroom for printing and we have to holler at them - NO !!!
Be thankful that you had the option of using cash. More and more often in my experience, only plastic is accepted.....
All I know is 54% of my property taxes go to education here in NJ and I have no kids in school here. (I moved from NY where my kid went to public school).
Just like in photography, many things have changed since many of us were young. It can be dangerous to compare current realities with past circumstances.
All I know is 54% of my property taxes go to education here in NJ and I have no kids in school here. (I moved from NY where my kid went to public school).
Maybe that will leave only the most dedicated non-digital photographers to use large format, collodion process.That is what they said about artists that paint with brushes and they are still going strong. what I think will kill film is the lack of equipment to use it.
The production of good 35mm and Med Format cameras started to die off in the early to mid 2000's and when they are worn out and cannot be repaired, or the price of film increases because the quantity being produced makes it phenomenally expensive, even the most dedicated film user will give up. Not because they want to, it will be availability of cameras coupled with the prohibitive cost of film
So? Taxes go for all types of things we don't directly utilize. As stated on the IRS building in Washington DC, "Taxes are what we pay for a civilized society." - Oliver Wendell Holmes
We all do. It's included in the purchase price.I think people ought to pay a "film tax" to subsidize my photography.
This is just down the road from me, the location of Custer's Last Stand.
"Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument intends to move to a fully cashless fee system and only accept credit card, debit card, mobile or electronic payments for entrance and permit fees by November 1, 2022."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?