Agulliver
Member
I don't think we could accuse digital photographers of not being willing to invest time, money and effort. I suspect the real stumbling block with film is the darkroom itself. Youngsters aren't often in a position where they can devote space to a darkroom or convert parts of buildings that don't belong to them, or feel settled enough. Communal/college darkrooms may not be available and can be dispiriting unless there is a tyrant in charge.
Of course it doesn't actually require much kit to make decent prints, and temporary use of the bathroom can be enough facility. But when I did that I was a bachelor, so there were no queues of cross-legged children, and the (only) loo was outdoors. I had to wait most of my life to have my own darkroom shed capable of really good prints, and a dry mounting press that occupies a square metre of the house. If I was starting now, I don't imagine I would find the analogue route terribly tempting.
I know some still consider it heresy, but if one develops B&W film and then scans....almost no space is needed. I keep all my film developing equipment in a bucket. Chemicals, changing bag, thermometer, two developing tanks, four reels, extension tube for Jobo tank. All I actually need in addition to all this is a sink and cold water. Anyone can have that even in shared accommodation. I've considered developing film while on a camping trip (spousal unit isn't enthusiastic though). All one needs then is a computer (show me a youngster who doesn't have one, especially a student) and a scanner....which can be had cheap second hand. There are even phone apps to scan negatives with phone cameras.
When it comes to making prints, yes that would require at least temporarily taking over a closet or bathroom....and I am fully aware that many European flats don't even have a closet. But one can get started with just a small amount of equipment.
Wat is actually putting people off, according to the camera shop staff I speak with, is unpredictable supply of C41 film.