Is the digital photo craze dead? DPReview.com shutting down.

WWPPD2025-01-scaled.jpg

A
WWPPD2025-01-scaled.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 33
Shannon Falls.jpg

D
Shannon Falls.jpg

  • 3
  • 0
  • 74
Trail

Trail

  • 1
  • 0
  • 92
IMG_6621.jpeg

A
IMG_6621.jpeg

  • 1
  • 2
  • 174
Carved bench

A
Carved bench

  • 1
  • 3
  • 196

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,077
Messages
2,769,325
Members
99,559
Latest member
Evraissio
Recent bookmarks
0

madNbad

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Messages
1,402
Location
Portland, Oregon
Format
35mm RF
I think planned obsolescence is getting harder and harder for many tech companies. For most people, we have enough computing power and image-taking resolution that a yearly upgrade has been pointless for many years now. I recently purchased an M1 MacBook air for biz, photo and web stuff. I can't fault it and everything is instant no matter what I throw at it. Now they talk about the M3 chip about to come out, well I think I'm set for at least 5yrs or until this M1 breaks. I have been using a Fujifilm XT-3, and I would never need more than what this cam does, so will likely use it until it dies. Seeing as arcade machines from the 1980s are still going, I think there is a good chance I'll get 15+yrs out of it at least, and now they are already pushing the XT-5. Tech seems close to being wholly dependent on 1st-time users, which must be a dwindling market?

Apple gets you with OS updates. I’m on my third iPad because the last two ran out of memory trying to keep up with the latest IOS. Sony is one of the worst. They never issue firmware updates, they just want you to buy a new camera. I gave up using the navigation system in my 2014 Honda because the updates were expensive and outdated by the time they were installed.
 

ph

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
157
Location
Norway
Format
35mm
The bits that write themselves (the fora) cost little except server storage for pictorial examples - which amazon has enough of, but the 11 employees were too much for them.

Selfpropelled dialogues can continue other sites like the french "collections appareils.fr" the german "Digicam club.de" and on "Mflenses" but the ad-and buying new bits content now has to be actively sought.

It is likely that Amazon has no interest in anything that mainly sells used or in small numbers . So they may be adapting to a less globalized and more frugal future world.

p.
 

VinceInMT

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 14, 2017
Messages
1,879
Location
Montana, USA
Format
Multi Format
I think planned obsolescence is getting harder and harder for many tech companies. For most people, we have enough computing power and image-taking resolution that a yearly upgrade has been pointless for many years now…..

And with fewer moving parts, newer tech is likely to last a long time. As long as the device does what you wanted it to do when you bought it, and that is still all you need it to do, why upgrade? Cases in point: I have a computer that I built from parts I bought from NewEgg about 18 years ago. It is running Windows XP. I just finished two jobs on it, one a graphic arts thing using a version of Pagemaker released in 1995. The other was a video project using Adobe Premiere 6.5. Everything worked as it did and still does. That is not to say I’m a Luddite as another computer on my desk is a 24” iMac with the M1 chip.

And for me, the same goes with automobiles. I haven’t had a good reason or heard a good argument to upgrade from my 1983 Volvo that I bought in the late-80s. It still runs solid (I do my own work on it) so why get one of those expensive, highly electronic new-angled things?
 

Kodachromeguy

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 3, 2016
Messages
2,034
Location
Olympia, Washington
Format
Multi Format
Some articles on Dpreview, like this one on the development of sensors, were useful:


As others have noted, the forums were out of control, a cesspool of fanboism and trolling. I will miss being able to look up a written review of a specific camera or accessory. I hope Wayback can archive some of the reviews.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,528
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
...I have been using a Fujifilm XT-3, and I would never need more than what this cam does, so will likely use it until it dies. Seeing as arcade machines from the 1980s are still going, I think there is a good chance I'll get 15+yrs out of it at least...

Those arcade machines were assembled with solder that included lead, which has since been banned. As a result, "tin whiskers" deterioration of solder in recent devices generally limits their service life to around 20 years. I don't view this as a problem, since my D810 was made in 2017, and its likely remaining time exceeds my actuarially probable "service life." :smile:
 

MurrayMinchin

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Messages
5,476
Location
North Coast BC Canada
Format
Hybrid
Regarding stuff disappearing from the Internet...aren't there businesses out there that save everything daily and store it?

About 10 years ago while doing research, I noticed that quoted material would often be followed by a date & website address in court filings. Pretty sure that was to keep a trail of crumbs back to source material even if was deleted in the future.

I discovered the importance of doing this, even in the short term, because the proponent of a big industrial mega project I was a part of fighting against would keep moving damaging material around on their websites, to make it harder to find.

My favourite was a quote from a previous corporate social responsibility report that kept getting shuffled around, "Despite our best efforts to prevent spills, incidents occur" which didn't help their case in trying to build confidence within our community 😁
 
Last edited:

skorpiius

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
648
Location
Calgary, AB
Format
Medium Format
Some articles on Dpreview, like this one on the development of sensors, were useful:


As others have noted, the forums were out of control, a cesspool of fanboism and trolling. I will miss being able to look up a written review of a specific camera or accessory. I hope Wayback can archive some of the reviews.

Regarding stuff disappearing from the Internet...aren't there businesses out there that save everything daily and store it?
The Internet Archive aka Wayback Machine has done a good job of archiving reviews, minus the interactive comparison tool and high res sample galleries. However a couple of archivist groups are currently working on their own snapshot of the site including forums and the tools.

That said the Internet Archive is currently defending themselves in court against corporate interests this week...
 

r_a_feldman

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
163
Location
Chicago, IL
Format
Multi Format
Mike Eckman had an interesting posting on his site today. He was lamenting the loss of historical data when web sites close down. This will likely be an unfortunate side effect of the dpreview site closing. Whether you liked the site, or not, there is/was a lot of useful historical information there, and it all could easily disappear in the blink of an eye.

Mike Eckman on loss of historical data with dpreview shutdown

I have already saved some camera reviews that I am interested in as “html complete” and also printed them to PDF, but there are a lot more there that are of interest to me than I have time to save.
 

ph

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
157
Location
Norway
Format
35mm
A neo-luddite is not the worst "job-title" one can have, rather a mark of perceptiveness.

Originally the fictious colonel Ludd not just led the machine destroyers who lost their jobs, but also the many unemployed who united in protest against societal change.

To deplore current developments is laudable, but to analyze causality and offer improvements is even better.

p.
 

redbandit

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2022
Messages
440
Location
USA
Format
35mm
Some articles on Dpreview, like this one on the development of sensors, were useful:


As others have noted, the forums were out of control, a cesspool of fanboism and trolling. I will miss being able to look up a written review of a specific camera or accessory. I hope Wayback can archive some of the reviews.

The forums may have been a key because alot of glowing product reviews got shredded by people on the forums..

SO perhaps it can be seen as a "we dont think this forum user review will inspire anyone to purchase this item from us, so were just getting rid of the forum"
 

MamiyaBronica

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
17
Location
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Format
Medium Format
The Internet Archive aka Wayback Machine has done a good job of archiving reviews, minus the interactive comparison tool and high res sample galleries. However a couple of archivist groups are currently working on their own snapshot of the site including forums and the tools.

That said the Internet Archive is currently defending themselves in court against corporate interests this week...

Check out the IA for DPReview. It is filled with captures from their site of a special page that tells "bots" and "Scrapers" that they are not allowed to capture the site and to get lost... Classy, DPReview.
 

benveniste

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
521
Format
Multi Format
By now DPRevived is up and running-

Running a small forum site is cheap. Running a site at scale is not, as the admins of photrio would be the first to tell you.

Amazon bought dpreview primarily to funnel purchases to their marketplace. As the market for point-and-shoot and other consumer grade cameras dried up, so did the value of the site to Amazon. Amazon's ownership also limited their ability to attract external advertisers. So they ended up with a small non-strategic asset combined with the inevitable inefficiencies and overhead of a large company. So I'm not surprised at the shutdown.

One of the things I noticed in discussions about the shutdown is how few of the forum participants would be willing to accept paying for a subscription. If they attract more than a nominal-sized audience, that's something the successor sites are going to challenges in addressing. Internet display advertising has been coming less effective for a few years now, and privacy concerns and regulation will ensure that trend continues. That's why, for example, Facebook removed the "always free" language from its signup page in 2019, or why Musk is pushing so hard on new revenue streams for Twitter.

I'll continue to pay for Photrio and spend money with their sponsors. But if I want to participate in forums about, say, Micro-four-thirds gear I expect I'll have to pay for another site as well.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,117
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
DPReview has been given a reprieve...so the digital photo craze is not dead ?
 

skorpiius

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
648
Location
Calgary, AB
Format
Medium Format
Back for good it appears

1687375364287.png
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,260
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
So the digital craze isn’t dead? 😉

I suspect that some are burying it while it is still alive, just like they tried to do with film. 😲
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,230
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
The digital craze isn't dead? Are we sure...

I thought it was all q-bits now: "Maybe it's a 1, maybe it's a 0, can't tell right now, come back in a bit and maybe we can tell you."

Long live fuzzy thinking! Can't be bothered to be ambivalent or ambiguous? We now have a machine that can do that for you! And give a different answer every time you ask the same question. "What's my bank balance?" "Well, there is a 62.5% chance it is $3,458.19. And an 43% chance it is $2,809.21. There is an 82% chance that the sum of the chances will be greater than 100%"

It would be fitting to name one of these Quantum Quomputers "The Douglas Adams."
 

Sean

Admin
Admin
Joined
Aug 29, 2002
Messages
13,104
Location
New Zealand
Format
Multi Format
"5 billion digital photos are taken every day.
By 2030, around 2.3 trillion photos will be taken annually"

Seems not to be going anywhere, but by 2030 I wonder if people will spend much time at all in actual reality (I am betting on no), at which time photo-taking might collapse because everyone is mostly existing in VR world. 😬
 

bjorke

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
2,257
Location
SF sometimes
Format
Multi Format
"5 billion digital photos are taken every day.
By 2030, around 2.3 trillion photos will be taken annually"

Seems not to be going anywhere, but by 2030 I wonder if people will spend much time at all in actual reality (I am betting on no), at which time photo-taking might collapse because everyone is mostly existing in VR world. 😬

Everyone already exists in the VR world. Look at your desktop: it's not 2D, with those folders and documents and MS-Word pretending to be a sheet of paper. It's already VR, already 3D. It's just bad 3D. And yet it's VR-enough to get a few things done.

People will continue to make more and more and more pictures and they will individually mean less and less and less and less -- this deflationary-value aspect of photography has been on a consistent downward slope since at least 1850.


Daguerreotype-Manie-1839.jpeg
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom