Glasses have physical properties. Glasses don't have imaging qualities by themselves. Lenses designed with the glasses have imaging qualities, some of which are aesthetically subjective when used to make photographs. I mean one could measure something like undercorrected spherical aberration, so its existence is not subjective, but whether it's good or bad in pictorial use is subjective. But glasses by themselves don't have this property.
Interesting article on Russian lenses
-
A
- Thread starter DonW
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale Minolta 7000 (Refurbished) w/ 50mm f/1.7
- Started by Acere
-
For Sale FS: RARE Nikkormat FS body for Parts or Repair
- Started by AnselMortensen
-
Sold GONE!...FREE for Shipping Cost: Polaroid 110 Pathfinder Camera Body for Parts or Repair
- Started by AnselMortensen
-
Free FREE for Shipping Cost: Konica Auto-Reflex (Autorex) camera body for parts or repair
- Started by AnselMortensen
Forum statistics
Glasses have physical properties. Glasses don't have imaging qualities by themselves. Lenses designed with the glasses have imaging qualities, some of which are aesthetically subjective when used to make photographs. I mean one could measure something like undercorrected spherical aberration, so its existence is not subjective, but whether it's good or bad in pictorial use is subjective. But glasses by themselves don't have this property.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |