Glasses have physical properties. Glasses don't have imaging qualities by themselves. Lenses designed with the glasses have imaging qualities, some of which are aesthetically subjective when used to make photographs. I mean one could measure something like undercorrected spherical aberration, so its existence is not subjective, but whether it's good or bad in pictorial use is subjective. But glasses by themselves don't have this property.
Interesting article on Russian lenses
-
A
- Thread starter DonW
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale Partial roll of 70mm late date (2011) Portra 160 NC, frozen
- Started by MCB18
-
For Sale Berthiot Eurygraphe 180mm f/4 (France, c1900)
- Started by Manual Camera
-
For Sale FS: Rittreck Wista Revolving Graflok 4x5 Back
- Started by B.S.Kumar
-
For Sale FS: Mamiya M645 Right Angle Finders
- Started by B.S.Kumar
-
For Sale Lot of cameras for repair
- Started by Jbennett68
Forum statistics
- Threads
- 199,791
- Messages
- 2,796,752
- Members
- 100,037
- Latest member
- Jordan James Kaye
- Recent bookmarks
- 2
Glasses have physical properties. Glasses don't have imaging qualities by themselves. Lenses designed with the glasses have imaging qualities, some of which are aesthetically subjective when used to make photographs. I mean one could measure something like undercorrected spherical aberration, so its existence is not subjective, but whether it's good or bad in pictorial use is subjective. But glasses by themselves don't have this property.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |