That's going to be tough. Grain is to a large extent inherent to the film. So the obvious choice would be to get some Delta3200 and enjoy its significant grain.triple the apparent grain size
I'm assuming "use a smaller format" isn't the solution you were looking for.
Try a much more active developer, such as a print developer like Dektol. You may have to experiment to get development times dialed in.
Higher acutance developers will increase the appearance of grain, even if the grain itself isn't increased.
If you develop to higher contrast, the grain will be more apparent.
I'm assuming "use a smaller format" isn't the solution you were looking for.
Underexposing + overdeveloping in Rodinal gives me all the grain I can handle.
There's the best answer. Use the fastest film you can get your hands on in the smallest format you can manage if you want more grain. Shoot with a wide-angle lens and crop severely if you need a smaller format than you actually have. Develop in an acutance developer or print developer or even lith developer. Don't use solvent developers like D-76 or Xtol, since they smooth out the grain by dissolving away the edges.
If you need an even grittier look, you might try temperature shocking the film during processing to induce reticulation.
Best,
Doremus
That's going to be tough. Grain is to a large extent inherent to the film. So the obvious choice would be to get some Delta3200 and enjoy its significant grain.
But if it needs to òe HP5+, I'm with the other posters. Get a nice and active developer like paper developer, or plain old rodinal. Patrick Gainer's vitamin C developer formula also gives rather emphasized grain. Heck, even pyrocat with extended development gives some pretty obvious grain with HP5+. Whatever you do, just develop liberally and grain will grow up to a certain point. I'd only forego the xtol as it tends to give somewhat less grainy negatives (which is exactly why I like it!)
I used half frame 35mm. I got a Samurai which pulls film vertically and I tape the film can with foil to encode 250 speed for Tri-X.
An Olympus Pen would be a lot of fun to shoot as well. But then you will tend to see pictures in a vertical format (better for magazine covers but might not feel familiar).
Then I develop in Dektol 1:9
I'm also lost when it comes to mentally masking the viewfinder, so I'm resigned to cropping after the fact. And that's fine, I'm trying to loosen up a bit anyway. I appreciate the advice, Bill.It’s just a tool to achieve an artistic vision... in this case it’s good. But if you have a 24mm lens and can mask the viewfinder in your mind, great. I just can’t do it. A pocket instamatic also works, so does a Minox. But those require additional equipment (reels tanks).
+1Underexposing + overdeveloping in Rodinal gives me all the grain I can handle.
Why complicate matters unnecessarily?Would extending the development time substantially followed by an application of Barry Thornton's Bleach-Bleach-And-Monobath technique [1] on the resulting negatives give negatives with normal contrast but larger-than-normal grain?
1. http://sannyassa.co.uk/barry-thorntons-writings/
Why complicate matters unnecessarily?
Underexposing + overdeveloping in Rodinal gives me all the grain I can handle.
But if that's fairly easily achievable by just developing longer or using another easily available developer, wouldn't it complicate matters to include processing steps? I mean, it would make sense to try the easy options first.I wouldn't. The OP wants big grain.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?