Shown as coming soon on this Australian site; Kayell Queensland at Aus $17.50 for a 24mm exposure roll
one set of the coating lines went to form InoviscoatWhat happened to the former Agfa color film manufacturing equipment and/or factories? Did it get sold to another company or was the machinery scrapped? That was the tragedy of Polaroid's factories in Massachusetts. The bankruptcy operators destroyed unique machines.
Ilford's instagram account makes no mention of any colour film.
Which Ilford?
The Ilford that actually manufactures photographic materials - the one that matters?
This product is being marketed by Ilford Imaging, which has no connection to Harman - who have the licence to use the Ilford name on B&W photographic products.
So "the Ilford that actually matters" has no interest one way or the other in this. There's absolutely no reason why they should mention it in their social media.
I've also read elsewhere that this may be a special product for Australia and New Zealand only.
Did you read the first post? "Saw a posting on IG that Ilford will be releasing a line of color-negative film in July."
My comment was saying that @ilfordphoto - the one that most people think of as "Ilford" - never posted anything about it. It wasn't difficult to understand what I was saying.
It would actually be noteworthy if Harman Ilford released a colour film.
Funny how different people read replies differently. It was my impression that Agulliver was simply reinforcing your point as he and you agree completely on this announcement having nothing to do with IlfordPhoto in Mobberley
pentaxuser
The Ilford that actually manufactures photographic materials - the one that matters?
"other" Ilford
From the gloss on their website, Ilford Imagining is derived from the Swiss Ilford plant which seemed to have had capabilities to make inkjet paper and colour photographic paper - and possibly Ilfochrome (but maybe that was made by someone else - they only mention a final production run of it). They have been bought and sold a couple of times and reformed in 2014 as what they are now - which may be a branding company but may still manufacture paper? They are currently owned by a Japanese photochemical company and an Australian photography equipment importer. It'd be weird if they didn't at least make paper.
They do not make film or cameras.
Harman also makes (or at least brands) inkjet paper - but it is not branded Ilford.
To my knowledge, the Swiss Ilford don't make colour photographic paper (RA4).
I fully expect the plant only manufactures inkjet paper, now.
The retention of the original buildings enabled Adox to acquire use of the former Ilford imaging Machine E (the medium scale test coating line) from 2015.
Chugai Photo Chemical (Japan) and CR Kennedy (Aus) acquired the naming rights from the receivers to form Ilford Imaging Europe (registered in Germany) and then relaunched the Galerie papers in 2014. These products are sub-contracted.
Does that mean that machine is still in the Marly factory and is being used by Adox under contract up to now?
As I understand it, Harman have a license that includes the right to use "Ilford" on anything that relates to black and white, chemical based photography. Thus the "Ilford" darkroom tent.
also Harman Inkjet paper. as it is not Sensitized.According to the UK trademark registry, Harman has a licence from Ilford imaging europe (Trademark owner) to use the ILFORD tm for the following categories;
Photographic plates, sensitised photographic films
Paper, sensitised for photographic purposes
Photographic accessories
According to the UK trademark registry, Harman has a licence from Ilford imaging europe (Trademark owner) to use the ILFORD tm for the following categories;
Photographic plates, sensitised photographic films
Paper, sensitised for photographic purposes
Photographic accessories
This does explain why its an ilford darkroom tent but a Harman branded disposable camera loaded with ilford hp5 film. (Cameras being a different category)
Its likely there are some other restrictions as part of the licence agreement so you are likely correct in terms of use for any b&w product. Also its not clear if there is a cost to use the licenses which might influence their use.
With the more prominent Harman co branding maybe one day it will be Harman HP5, certainly they wouldn’t be the first company to change brand name.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |