Let's just be very blunt and to the point with one thing here. Skip the hysteria over Kodak and concentrate on what Fujifilm is doing.
In E6, Fujifilm is the major player. Kodak doesn't even rate a mention on the radar. Ektachrome is still seen as a non-event by many traditional dyed-in-the-wool consumers of E6 products.
Mid-last year there were murmurings through two distributors that Fuji was working on an exit from analogue products in 2020. I am keeping my ear to the ground with my own distributor. If they do exit, that will cause a collapse of E6 availability, in particular the labs and the chemicals they use. For some time -- a few years now, a trend has been seen for labs to scale down processing availability or cease processing of E6 completely. For E6 to be worthwhile, a large amount of the product must be run through the machinery to keep it going; the process is filthy. The inescapable fact is E6 is diminishing continuously in take-up and processing availability. We should collectively not be holding our breath for Kodak as any sort of saviour for the market, but getting cracking with whatever other E6 materials are available to keep the machines turning. If we don't, we have only ourselves to blame, not the film manufacturers.
Do it.
Film is dead.E6 is dead.
Hasselblad glass rocks with slide film... maybe you just need a 6x6 projector?Good question. Who knows? I do not see myself using E6 film in any size.
I'd "Report This Post" but it's just too funny.Fine you didn't mentioned Trump again
with regards
Fine you didn't mentioned Trump again
with regards
Film is dead.
NICE!i heard there will be a t... brand film coming soon
gold and black packaging really classy stuff
and only a putz wouldn't wanna buy it.
using this fabulous film is a chance of a lifetime
perfect exposures every time, you'll take photographs like a pro
not only that, but every sale benefits not only the namesake, BUT also
a small undisclosed percentage of the net net net net
goes to the political defense fund to help a lot of very fine people ...
fine print: thre is 1 or maybe 2 exposures per roll, the film manufacturers, their sponsors or branding conglomerate
( located in the cayman islands ) bear no responsibility if the film in the cassette is not long enough to reach the camera take up spool
or for the skill or inability to be a professional picture taker. all photographs for this paid informercial were made by
a super well known commerical photgrapher of the highest caliber who i know personally, and none of it was taken using the film being sold.
photography is about dreams and missed opportunity and using this film you will keep dreaming you bought a diffeent film.
you DON"T want to miss this opportunity of a lifetime !NICE!
I know it’s nonsenseThat's nonsense. E6 on the other hand, is truly dying. It may not be dead right now, but it's mortally wounded and will soon disappear.
There are nothing like lantern slides either, but no one makes them any more. There is still a niche for buggy whips; fortunately, artisans can make them with hand tools; no industrialized machines are required....there is nothing and will never be anything like a glass mounted 6x6 projected onto a big screen.
The number of people doing large format projection would be too small for any manufacture. And they still could make a contact copy on print film.
Hunt Chemicals in NA make E6 chemicals, many options other than Fuji chems.Let's just be very blunt and to the point with one thing here. Skip the hysteria over Kodak and concentrate on what Fujifilm is doing.
In E6, Fujifilm is the major player. Kodak doesn't even rate a mention on the radar. Ektachrome is still seen as a non-event by many traditional dyed-in-the-wool consumers of E6 products.
Mid-last year there were murmurings through two distributors that Fuji was working on an exit from analogue products in 2020. I am keeping my ear to the ground with my own distributor. If they do exit, that will cause a collapse of E6 availability, in particular the labs and the chemicals they use. For some time -- a few years now, a trend has been seen for labs to scale down processing availability or cease processing of E6 completely. For E6 to be worthwhile, a large amount of the product must be run through the machinery to keep it going; the process is filthy. The inescapable fact is E6 is diminishing continuously in take-up and processing availability. We should collectively not be holding our breath for Kodak as any sort of saviour for the market, but getting cracking with whatever other E6 materials are available to keep the machines turning. If we don't, we have only ourselves to blame, not the film manufacturers.
Do it.
I get a bit sad when I read stuff like this to be honest, I mean colour film is just as special as black and white, and although more expensive sometimes its really worth it.I don't plan to shoot color film in any format again. I will continue to shoot black and white film for the foreseeable future.
LF sheet film has never been projected -- I don't know where you got that information from. It has been and continues to be used in RA-4 printing for quite large reproduction, including to backlit panels, Ilfochrome Classic and other methods. This has been the way for many decades. People hang on to printing from slides because it relates to the old days of photogravure and reproduction of images for publication.
Hunt Chemicals in NA make E6 chemicals, many options other than Fuji chems.
And they still could make a contact copy on print film
Quite ironic, when someone whose mother tongue appears to be American, makes that claim to someone, who speaks English as a second language.It's not hearsay when I tell you that I do call that famous city on the US East coast 'New York'. The locals may not understand which place I'm talking about...
But it is a sign of good character that you're not familiar with the concept of heresy!
Hasselblad glass rocks with slide film... maybe you just need a 6x6 projector?
Not interested. Slides do not reproduce as well as negative film.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?