I'd like a Leica but ...

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 1
  • 0
  • 10
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 1
  • 23
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 167
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 163

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,814
Messages
2,781,227
Members
99,710
Latest member
LibbyPScott
Recent bookmarks
0

C A Sugg

Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
195
Location
Richmond, VA
Format
Multi Format
I recall a photographer, active around 1960, talking about the living that some camera techs made cleaning the lint out of pocketed Leicas.
 
OP
OP
hughitb

hughitb

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
230
Location
Dublin, Irel
Format
Medium Format
As we now hit post number 103 on this thread you will all be glad to hear that I am nearly there ...... thanks for all the comments and opinions and so on, even if sometimes they did diverge wildly!

I've decided the best thing for me lens-wise is to get a new 35/1.4 Nokton. A Summicron is out of my league, I could go for the Summaron but I think I would really value the extra stops that a 1.4 lens gives me. I also won't have to worry about the uncertainties involved in buying a 40-year old lens.

So, my final question! There is a single-coated and a multi-coated version. The blurb on cameraquest says

"The SC is excellent for color while giving slightly more shadow detail for B/W. The MC version gives the maximum amount of flare prevention while giving slightly higher contrast in B/W but less shadow detail. "

Is this bullshit? Anyone got an opinion about which to go for? I would envisage using it mostly outdoors and for b&w ....
 

nemo999

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
277
Format
35mm
"The SC is excellent for color while giving slightly more shadow detail for B/W. The MC version gives the maximum amount of flare prevention while giving slightly higher contrast in B/W but less shadow detail. "

Is this bullshit? Anyone got an opinion about which to go for? I would envisage using it mostly outdoors and for b&w ....

Definitely not bullshit - the SC lens gives you the opportunity to buy a new 1950s/1960s-style lens, the MC has all the characteristics of state-of-the-art lens design (in practice, you might find the contrast excessive - the choice is yours).
 

Larry Bullis

Subscriber
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
1,257
Location
Anacortes, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
I have the 40mm sc Nokton and absolutely love it! I really don't like MC lenses that much. So easy to underexpose. The sc version has a great deal of grace. If you like grace, that's the way to go. But, you know, my first RF camera was a Contax II with an uncoated f/2 50mm Sonnar. I'd love to have another one of those!

Of course this is subjective. Those of us who loved the qualities of the photography that we saw in LIFE Magazine, etc. may sometimes have a tendency to be disappointed in the exaggerated contrast at the expense of shadows that I nearly always see in the lenses everyone else seems to love. I never have been able to understand why they want it that way.

Try this with the MC. I bet you'd be unhappy.
 

Attachments

  • Templo de Conception.jpg
    Templo de Conception.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 172

Larry Bullis

Subscriber
Joined
May 23, 2008
Messages
1,257
Location
Anacortes, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
...
However, he also has a 35mm Summaron that he says is f2 but I think when he goes and digs it out he will realise it is f2.8. Now this is a fairly old lens from what I can gather by looking into it on the net....

Or f/3.5. I have an f/3.5 in the LTM mount. I like the 40mm f/1.4 Nokton a lot better, but the Summaron is a pretty good lens if the price is right. Slow, though. If you ever want to work at night (I MUST work at night) it would be an endless frustration.
 

elekm

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
2,055
Location
New Jersey (
Format
35mm RF
The single coated lens are more forgiving, especially in high-contrast situations.

I'm using several older single-coated lenses from the 1950s, and while they're prone to flare, I like that they produce a lower-contrast image. A lens shade helps, although with wide angles, there's only so much that you can do.

Because I know it flares, I'm a bit more careful about where light sources (such as the sun or lamps) are in the scene.
 

nicefor88

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
248
Location
Bruxelles, B
Format
35mm
Like other members said before, just get a M6. That's the best Leica money can buy. The German engineers just reached the summit when creating this beauty. The best-built of the M line. The M7 is less solid, has some cheap parts because of budget cuts! What a shame!
I have owned a silver finish M6 and now owns a M6 TTL in black finish equipped with a Summicron 35 wide-angle f2 aspherical. A deadly pair!!
M6 forever!!!!!:wink:
 

elekm

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
2,055
Location
New Jersey (
Format
35mm RF
I think that if you want a Leica, don't settle for anything less.

It's like going to a restaurant, and you really want a steak, but then you let people around you talk you into getting a hamburger. Sure, it's still beef, but it's not the same.

In the long run, it will save you the time and money that you'll spend on other products.

Buy what you want. Buy it once. And be done with it. Then all that's left is to have fun taking photos.
 

stealthman_1

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2008
Messages
91
Location
Northern Cal
Format
Medium Format
-^-
Agree 100%.
I like the Bessa, I like the Zeiss Ikon a bit better, I like my Nikon S2. I love my Leica. I have many antique cameras, none of which shoots pictures with more than novelty quality except the Leicas. I've got an 1,100,000+ M3 and people are shocked when I tell the it's a year older than I am.:smile:
 
OP
OP
hughitb

hughitb

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
230
Location
Dublin, Irel
Format
Medium Format
It's done! I am now the proud owner of an M6 TTL + 50mm F2 Summicron.

As soon as I manage to sell some more stuff I'll pick up the 35mm Nocton as well.
 

Kvistgaard

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
282
Location
Svendborg, D
Format
Multi Format
Congrats Hugh - I own the same camera/lens, and am very very pleased with it. Hard to see it fitting in with your original requirements about pocketability, but what the heck, it is a brilliant piece of machinery. Did you get the black or the grey version?

happy shooting!
 
OP
OP
hughitb

hughitb

Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
230
Location
Dublin, Irel
Format
Medium Format
Hard to see it fitting in with your original requirements about pocketability, ....

I know! I actually tried fitting it in my jacket pocket today and it kind of just about did, with the lens hood off. As has been suggested already, I'll just choose clothes with bigger pockets in future.

Did you get the black or the grey version?

happy shooting!

Black. It's in really good condition too.
 

nocrop

Member
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
105
Format
35mm
Remember, this is a fixed cost expense. Your going to "spend" a lot of time behind this viewfinder/camera... now's not the time to be tight with the initial cost, think how little an hour the real cost is going to be, over the time you and this beautiful body will be intimate... what's going to snag the best image is what counts. Bill

Words of wisdom.
 

Brad Maestas

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2009
Messages
12
Location
Astoria, NY,
Format
35mm RF
Great news. Sounds like you got a great deal! How do you like it now, two months later?

I was in your position not too long ago. I had been considering all the RF options in my budget and had sort of settled on the idea of the Bessa R3M kit (with 50/2 Heliar) and an R4M and wides to come later but around the same time I found a private local seller offering an M6 Panda with 35mm Summicron pre-ASPH IV for a song so I jumped on it instead. While I had been leaning towards the Bessas pretty heavily, I still wanted a Leica eventually so I thought it the better buy.

To paraphrase what elekm said back on page 2: There's no reason to get another camera if a Leica is what you truly seek.

I then started looking for a 50mm. I had a Summicron for a while and found a nice pre-ASPH Summilux that was much better shooting in dim clubs. I think my next step is an R4M with some wides followed by some more Leica bodies and glass. I'd really like to get a IIIf or IIIg, some older M's like the M2/M3/M4 and a tele (or both 75/90).

Happy shooting!
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
I know people who have bought a Canon P and Canon 35mm f/2, not liked them and replaced with a M7 and 5cm type IV cron.

But I'm happy with the Canon, given the outlay is about 50%, and I cannot see any difference.

The P is noisier but is quicker at reloading, just as comfy to hand and the lens flares less, - I do have an M as well, when I'm street shooting in an iffy area I use a Canon.

Noel
 

nocrop

Member
Joined
May 18, 2006
Messages
105
Format
35mm
I hear ya. Sold my M6 and now use my Canon P. Hopefully there's a Serenar 50/1.8 v.1 waiting for me when I get home tonight.
:D
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom