As for lenses....there is a very big price difference between the 50mm f1.8 D and the 35mm F2 D. Is it worth it? If you could only have one, would you choose the 35mm over the 50mm? Do you notice any handling difference of the camera with either of these?
There is a very big price difference, made even bigger by the likelehood that the 35 will need to be fixed/serviced due to oily blades.
Apologists will say you need to store the lens on its side or end or whatever nonsense it is. Which is ridiculous- that should never be a concern! It was a mfg error by Nikon plain and simple.
If your 35f2 D is fine, then it really is a fantastic lens. And my pick over the 50 1.8d if that is the choice.
But if I was concerned about budget then I’d be happy w the excellent 50 vs looking at possibly $400 after service for the 35