• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

I just don't get the 35mm vs bigger format thing.

MIT. 25:35

MIT. 25:35

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Lutheran Cemetery Angel

H
Lutheran Cemetery Angel

  • 0
  • 0
  • 28

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,945
Messages
2,847,963
Members
101,550
Latest member
Paris-Belle
Recent bookmarks
0
But wait! There's more. I have a 4x5 shot exact same composition as one on Pocket Instamatic, where the Pocket Instamatic shot is better.

And if that isn't enough. Try to solve my riddle how I got hundreds, maybe thousands of negatives represented on one Minox negative.

Easy: you took a photo of your darkroom, including your neg filing system.
 
Dan Fromm,

I appreciate you coming here as a Member to discuss this, reminded me to put the photos in the thread directly instead of the Gallery where only Subscribers could see them.

eddie,

You might be onto something. I never liked the two 4x5 burned out forest shots. They are atrocities of composition, painful to look at. While the Minox shot is actually quite pleasing. Maybe that's why I like the Minox shot while I can't stand the other two. I always thought the harsh reality of fire was why I couldn't bear to look at them. Now I know they are just plain bad.
 
Bill- Just to clarify- In no way was my comment directed at you, or your photos. I just see a lot of posts regarding equipment (and chemical) "upgrades", where the posters seem to think the "upgrades" will make them better photographers. I've never regarded you to be in that category of poster.
 
Easy: you took a photo of your darkroom, including your neg filing system.

BBurkCOI.JPG

Bill Burk, Burroughs Negative Files, City of Industry, 1984
 
Next pair of prints illustrate that you should plan to use a tripod if you expect to gain the resolution benefit of larger formats.

The two shots are same exact subject, two different cameras. 110 Pocket Instamatic and 4x5 TMY-2.

Mistletoe has always had a special meaning to me (see my gallery).

I suppressed the urge to grab a low-hanging bunch and stuff it in my pack to take home and hang from the ceiling. I know it goes against all kinds of ethics... Meanwhile I thought taking home an amazing photo of mistletoe would satisfy the craving.

The 110 shot came out as planned. But something went wrong when I took the 4x5 shot. I lost my cable release earlier in the day so I found myself improvising and tugging at the shutter release with a grass lasso. The tug caused camera shake. It's my opinion that the 110 is the more successful print. The 4x5 is arguably better. But only marginally.

mistletoe_110.jpg

Oak and Mistletoe, Black Diamond Mines (Pocket Instamatic)
110 High Resolution Close-Up

mistletoe_45.JPG

Oak and Mistletoe, Black Diamond Mines (4x5)
4x5 High Resolution Close-Up
 
Those are the significant lessons from this exercise. The remaining images that I will post in this thread are just examples of similar scenery treated with both Minox and 4x5, some successful in Minox, some better in 4x5.
 
Have we yet determined how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

It's either the same as the number of film grains you can count if you enlarge a Minox negative to 16x20 feet. Or the the line pairs per mm you can see on an 8x10 negative reduced to Minox size. Don't remember which.


:munch:
 
Have we yet determined how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

The rule of fantastically imaginative thought allows for any number between 0 and infinity or both at the same time.
 
Have we yet determined how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

I think Kitty Tatch and Katherine Hazelston answered this question when they danced atop Overhanging Rock at Glacier Point for George Fiske.

What kinds of pin, European or African?

The scales I used in my photograph close-ups show markings of sixteenths of an inch.

What kind of angels, European or African? :smile:

I don't knooooooooooooooooooowwwww!
 
Is this thread about clanking two halves of coconuts together and pretending its a a real horse galloping? :D
 
Oh, I'm sorry. This is abuse.

attachment.php

Graham Chapman - KMET - September 21, 1980

I'm sorry if my last post seemed abusive. It was only intended as sly friendly humor.
 
As promised, no specific lesson...

An example Minox photograph that stands up pretty well on its own.

IMG_8764s.jpg
River Scene

High Resolution Close-Up
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No specific lesson...

An example 35mm photograph (APX-25) where everything came together, I think this print stands up well next to 4x5 photographs.

aspen.jpg

Aspen View

High Resolution Close-Up
 
I almost forgot. I promised to be fair. Here are a pair where the 4x5 (Godzilla) stomps on Minox (Bambi).

It's not just the fact that the Minox has lost critical sharpness due to camera movement. The Minox just can't keep up against a crisp flowing water scene similar to this which was taken on large format.


dinkeyc_45.jpg

Dinkey Creek (4x5)
High Resolution Close-Up


dinkeyc_m.jpg

Dinkey Creek (Minox)
High Resolution Close-Up
 
Here is a 4x5 shot that stands on its own.

Stopped for lunch break at Purple Lake on the John Muir Trail. When they had passed us on the trail earlier, I couldn't work the camera fast enough to get a shot of them riding by. I spoke briefly with the rider just long enough to know the horse's name is Doc, he was happy to pose for a shot.

purple_lkcs.jpg

Doc and Rider, Purple Lake
High Resolution
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom