Hunting for a #10 Cirkut Camera

Looking back

D
Looking back

  • 1
  • 0
  • 15
REEM

A
REEM

  • 3
  • 0
  • 81
Kitahara Jinja

D
Kitahara Jinja

  • 5
  • 0
  • 65
Custom Cab

A
Custom Cab

  • 4
  • 2
  • 83

Forum statistics

Threads
197,609
Messages
2,761,873
Members
99,416
Latest member
TomYC
Recent bookmarks
0

CRhymer

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
439
Location
Fort Smith,
Format
ULarge Format
Thanks Jamie and Len,

Butkus if great - first place I went, but thank you for the link. People spend a lot for manuals, when a small donation will get them what they want.

Well, there is brass and then there is brass. The trick is to get the metals matched and all playing nice. I am no expert at this, but the fact that yours works fine, Jamie, is useful information. Stainless (also many types) can be a bit of a challenge to the duffer (me). I'll pm Ron and see what he thinks.

Thanks again guys.

Cheers,
Clarence
 

Neanderman

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2004
Messages
565
Location
Ohio River Valley
Format
Large Format
Regarding films...

A Cirkut camera has long been on my list of dream cameras. I love panos and I love contact prints. They were made for me!

But I've wondered what you were all using for film. I know next to nothing about Cirkut film, but I wonder if it is something Simon at Ilford would consider a run of. What thickness is the base? Is there a "common" spool? Does the film have a backing paper? If so, is it like 120, over the whole roll, or like 220, just at the end(s)?

Edumicate me, please.

Ed
 

c.d.ewen

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Messages
685
Location
Northeast USA
Format
ULarge Format
Does Arvid Olsen ever sell any of his Cirkut equipment? He buys a lot of Cirkut stuff on eBay (as arvideo). I sold him a Century No 10 years ago, and he's still active: for example. I seem to recall he recently bought a spare 6" tripod and ring gear from Australia. What does he do with all of it?

Charley
 

Len Robertson

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
154
Format
Large Format
Ed - Cirkut film is like wide 220. Paper backing at both ends. As I recall, the thickness is approx. .004 inch, more or less the same as smaller roll film. Isn't sheet film about .007 in.? I love your Lee Friedlander quote. One thing with a Cirkut shot - everything and everybody in the area gets in the picture.

Charley - I've wondered myself about the eBay Cirkut buyers. I watch most all of it sell, and it seems there are a couple of the same names pretty often. Buying for resale? Compulsive hoarders? When I first looked at the link you posted, I thought Yikes, as far as the price for a basket case Attachment. But then I saw the gears included. That must have been what he was after.

Len
 

panoramic

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2006
Messages
42
Format
ULarge Format
Not all cirkut ring gears are steel

In fact most are made out of 1/8 inch brass and nickel plated to make the surface hard. I've only seen 1 #10 steel gear, and 2 #16 steel gears.

Brass is just fine to use and a lot easier to cut.

The big thing is to have the top face of the gear perfectly flat or the camera will wobble slightly when revolving and could cause problems. In the factory they would often add small paper shims to level the gear on the tripod head. Usually the problem is not the ring gear but the rollers having flat spots. They need to be perfect, and have a slight crown on them like an over inflated tire. When the wear down and get flat, they have to skid slightly when going around and then start wearing out even faster. Think of it like a car going in a tight circle, the outside wheels need to turn faster. If both sides of the car's wheels were fixed to the axles so they had to rotate at the same rate, one side or the other would have to skid. In a microscopic way this is what is happening to the roller on the turntable unless it is crowned.

Also, be sure to keep everything oiled, not soaking with oil as that will attract dirt, but oiled often and then wiped down. 3 in one oil is OK not anything heavier unless you are going to Death Valley in August. This applies to the gear shafts in the camera too. Use a very small brush to apply just one drop to each journal, run the camera then wipe. Do it often, but NEVER lube the gear teeth, Brass gears run dry, or you are asking for dirt to stick in the teeth and cause banding. I can go to great length to tell you how to clean up a cirkut gear train. I have a couple of good tricks to keep things clean too.

My #16 is a fan camera and I can run it without fans attached but it is noisy and not worth the risk of vibration damage. I cheated and put ball bearings in the guts. This was not for the fast speed, but to give me more power when I am using a really big fan like a ten second job or even bigger. I just make sure the wind isn't blowing or it will never run smooth. To prove the point, cup your hand around a running fan for shelter and it will noticeably speed up.
 

jamie young

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
421
Location
Syracuse, NY
Format
Multi Format
Clarence
I shot a few quick reference images and updated my web site with images of the fans and fan mechanism on my #10 camera- The link here
http://www.jamieyoungphoto.com/cirkutcameras n10 1.html
I have other info on some other pages as well
http://www.jamieyoungphoto.com/cirkutcameras1.html
and images shot with the camera here
http://www.jamieyoungphoto.com/Cirkut photos people 1.html

I got my #16 on ebay for an extremely reasonable price, but had to get a lense, make a big gear, get and have made small gears, fans, tripod, etc. It was a project and all worked out after about a year. I'm always amazed at what comes up on ebay though.
On aerial film, this image was shot using 5" plus x aerial stock. Probably not the best example but hey.
http://www.jamieyoungphoto.com/uw arboretum 5 cirkut.html

Ed on film: It's like 220 film- Just leader and trailer, no backing. It should be around the same thickness as 120 - this does matter!
Jamie
 

panoramic

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2006
Messages
42
Format
ULarge Format
gear cutting

There are probably a lot of better ways to cut gears, but this how I make mine and so far they have worked just fine for every cirkut I have ever used.

You need a metal lathe and a milling machine fitted with a dividing head and tailstock. As well you need the correct gear cutter installed on the mill and centered to the tailstock.

You will need to make a special arbor shaft that allows a rough gear blank with a ¼ reamed hole to be added. I have a 5/8 shaft turned down to ¼ inch and then threaded on the end with ¼ 28 thread. After I made it, I hardened the steel. The arbor shaft is center drilled on both ends so it can be set up with a face plate and lathe dog to turn it.

I rough cut my brass gear blank with a band saw and drill an undersized ¼ hole which I ream to exactly ¼ inch. Then the blank is put on the arbor and turned down on the lathe to the right outside diameter. Then it is moved to the dividing head on the mill and the teeth are cut. After the gear is cut and before it is removed from the arbor, it is put back in the lathe and lapped with very fine grinding compound using a spare prime number gear with a steel shaft. I simply hold the lapping gear shaft in my hands and mesh it into the fresh gear. My lathe can run in reverse so I lap in both directions. This removes edge burrs from the gear cutter and just evens thing out a bit all over. Final polish is with tripoli.

My arbor shaft allows for five blanks to be cut at once, or with smaller spacers I can cut just one gear as well.

So that covers the basics, but there is some great math needed to calculate the outside diameter of the gear blank, the depth to set the gear cutter, and which dividing plate to use for the right number of divisions. It isn’t difficult, but you have to think about it all the time. I made more than a few gears that came out goofy and had to be re-cut to make a gear with fewer teeth before I figured it out. Mostly, as with anything, it just takes patience.

If you are curious about the math, it goes something like this:

If you need a gear with a specific number of teeth say 37, add one to the number needed (this gives 38 in our example). Then divide by the pitch (cirkuts normally use 32 pitch except for #5 and #6 cameras, they use 48 pitch) That will give you the outside diameter of the gear blank. 2 divided by the pitch number gives the depth to run the cutter, but you also need to go slightly deeper for clearance. (I go 5% – 7 %, and sometimes less, this is where the practice comes in because of the range of teeth each cutter can make causes some fudging to be required) There are plenty of books telling you how to use a dividing head, I am always amazed at what plate and number of holes end up with the division you really need, it just never seems right but it works.

Hope this helps.

Ron
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,232
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
I knew better than to read through this post. Sheesh, this stuff is so contageous. I gotta quit my real job and just play non stop with old cameras. I bought a roll of Aerial Panatomic the other day that is fogged next to the reel on both ends. It would make gorgeous 8" film if someone trimmed 3/4" from both ends. I wonder who does that and how? My one picture I made with an 8, I trimmed down 9.5 aerial film, but it was horrible to try to work with in the dark. Hacksaw. Nightmares. The rough edges caused banding I'm pretty sure as it played out un-evenly. My approach since the film wasn't a big expense was to just load the camera in the dark and skip the paper leader and trailer.
 

CRhymer

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
439
Location
Fort Smith,
Format
ULarge Format
Thank you all.

Hello Jamie, Ron and Jim,

This is all very helpful. Great photos of your #10, it explains a lot. The fan shaft has an internal thread. It appears that each fan has a machine screw with knurled head inside the barrel and is permanently attached to each fan. Are the fan blades press fitted into slots?

Ron, do you use free machining brass for your gears? Is the large ring gear cut from one piece of stock, or formed from an over-sized strip, brazed and then machined? Is the brass ring gear durable enough to use without plating, that is, do you know if anyone has got any amount of use out of an unplated one before wear becomes a problem?

Jim, this camera you sold me is getting expensive.:wink:

Cheers,
Clarence
 

panoramic

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2006
Messages
42
Format
ULarge Format
Gears

I bought a large sheet of 1/8 inch free machining brass years ago for my gears before brass became the price of gold. Some of the older cirkuts use gears that are made from thicker brass and I scrounged a piece of 3/16" for those. I was going to make a gear out of a fifty cent piece once just for a joke. It would probably work.

Some of the commercial places that make gears seem to make "thick" gears and they really don't mesh well with the cirkuts. They are advertised as 32 pitch, 14.5 degree pressure angle, but the fit to the original ring gear is lousy. That is why I started making my own and taking a close look at the original gears and their fit.

The ring gears are made from one piece of flat brass, not a formed strip. And yes you can use them without the plating as most of the old cameras seem to have worn plating. I've even seen deep ruts, but that cannot be good. A simple fix would be to make a thin flat ring slightly smaller than the gear teeth that fits on the top of the gear and just glue it down if nothing else. A guy could use thin stainless and it wouldn't increase the height enough that the pinion shafts would be affected.

Although I have blanks cut to make 12" ring gears, I've never made them because there has never been a demand and I have enough for my machines. Mostly the issue is my lathe cannot swing that diameter and I need to us a friend's. That makes for a lot of running around. I've always wanted to make a ring gear with an odd number of teeth to change the ratios for some of the different lenses I use. A 10 inch ring gear would be better for wide angle work and a 14 inch gear for telephoto stuff would be dandy as the pinion gears would be slightly bigger.
 

panoramic

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2006
Messages
42
Format
ULarge Format
Cirkut Fans (and I don't mean friends)

If you don't care about originality, and own a lathe, a nice fan can be made out of square stock bored for the knurled screw that holds it to the shaft. Then add FOUR fan blades (one on each side, they don't need to radiate from the exact center) and balance it between centers on the lathe. Use trial and error to figure out the speed you are going to end up with. I guess I'm just happy with a 3/4 second fan even if it is an odd speed. I've tried adding weight thinking that would even out the spin. It does, but it takes some time to get up to speed. There is probably the exact right combo in there somewhere. I think a real improvement would be a fan that has a bearing support on the outside end of the shaft. That would prevent wobble.

You can add pieces of flat metal ,foam board, or mat board to a fan to slow it down for long exposures. I have one somewhere in my collection that is so big the bottom sides are beveled to prevent it from hitting the tripod legs. It's cool to watch it spin in slow motion and you could read a book during the exposure. Needless to say it isn't used much but looks good when you are on a stage demonstrating the cirkut for that big ego rush we all need to get once in a while.

The way the original fans were made is a bit complicated to keep the knurled screw from falling out. Not a problem if you have dedicated machines to make thousands of them but a pain to duplicate one or two and make money. I've made them just to prove I could do it, but when it takes all day to make something they are hard to sell. Again, if the demand were high, a person could make the tooling needed to mass produce the parts. We know that ain't gonna happen in this day and age but can dream.

Ron
 
OP
OP

DougGrosjean

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
341
Format
Medium Format
Cirkut Composition Question....

This active thread is probably the best place to ask, due to its high level of activity and expertise.

I have experience shooting with a 35mm Widelux and a 120-format Kodak Panoram.

The Widelux bows architecture a lot, Panoram less so.

Reading / browsing "America by the Yard" last night, I noticed that some Cirkut photos the buildings' bowing of straight lines behind is minimal to non-existent. One pic in particular, a group of pre-WW2 Japanese families posed in what looks like a straight line, parallel to the buildings behind them. That shot intrigued me, because I'm thinking that a paying architectural client (say, a farmer who wants barn and outbuildings and house, or a golf course owner who wants clubhouse and restaurant and bar in the shot) would want minimal bending of straight lines, to closely mimic reality.

So my question is: how to minimize bowing / dipping of straight lines in the Cirkut, for those times you don't want them..?

My guess is to use a longer lens, and fewer degrees of sweep. Correct?

Humbly submitted, since I don't quite own a Cirkut yet.... but it's a lot cheaper to ask now than to burn film experiementing, for such a basic question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jamie young

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
421
Location
Syracuse, NY
Format
Multi Format
Part of it is using a long lense when you can, which is practical with a cirkut. The other thing is to avoid sweeping a building so that the size goes from smaller to larger back to smaller again. Like if you place the camera right in front of the middle of the building, the middle is largest in the frame, and the building gets progressively smaller on both sides as you move away from that point. If the composition allows for the corner edge of the building to be closest to the lense the barrel effect is minimized.
 
OP
OP

DougGrosjean

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
341
Format
Medium Format
Thanks, Jamie.

I had come up with the same answers, but using logic from a different direction.

Figured a longer focal length would produce a bigger arc. That arc would be the plane of good focus. With the bigger arc, no part of the building would be as far from that plane of good focus as they would with a smaller arc, so the bowing would be lessened, and the image would appear to be flattened a bit.

I'm guessing that terms exist in this world for the concepts I'm describing, but I don't know the terms yet.
 

WJC

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
7
Format
Large Format
Hi Doug,
Although I am not a circuit shooter I noticed a #10 Circuit system for
sale At Igor Camera Exchange in Columbus, Ohio. See his website
under panoramic cameras.

Warren Clark
 

WJC

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2005
Messages
7
Format
Large Format
Hi Doug,

Correction: Igor Camera is in Cleveland.

Warren Clark
 
OP
OP

DougGrosjean

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
341
Format
Medium Format
Hi Warren,

Thanks!

That was actually the first one I checked on, thanks to its proximity to me (about 70 miles from my work). Price was a little on the high end - but I emailed Igor that I was shopping and interested, asking if I could come and look at it, see it run. I didn't say so, but perhaps an extremely nice unit would be worth what he was asking. No response; so I moved on.

It now looks like I've found a Cirkut. The owner has tentatively agreed to sell to me, is currently checking with his friends to make sure his price is fair to both parties. I've told him to take his time doing so, and to be sure. We're also figuring out other minor details, ie, a date to pick it up. That's all I will say for now, so that I don't endanger the transaction in any way.

I'm so excited about it I can barely contain myself. The seller, and several people behind the scenes here, have done me a very big favor by advising me and pointing me in the right directions in my quest for a Cirkut. I'm humbled and grateful.

More details at some point in the future. It's like a fairy tale come true for me...

Doug
 

Len Robertson

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
154
Format
Large Format
Doug - That is great news you seem to have found a #10. I agree the Igor Camera #10 is at the top end of the price scale, but it is hard to define a fair price for a #10 as so much depends on the condition and completeness of the camera. If are lucky enough to find one that the owner has actually used, it is probably worth a bit of a premium, compared to an eBay camera of unknown condition. I'm looking forward to hearing the #10 has actually followed you home and you are having hours of fun playing with it.

Len
 

SafariShootS

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
1
Format
ULarge Format
Hello:

I am new to this forum and like what I see so far.....

I just happend to see this thread and just had to respond.

I have a MINT condition Folmer-Schwing Cirkut #10, complete and in 9+ condition as well as a Rochester-Kodak Cirkut #10 in operational condition and am considering selling them both.

In addition, I have a Rochester-Kodak Cirkut #16 needing a proper lens. Any suggestions?

Anyone have any info of the "Bell Panoramic" cameras?

Thanks to all.
Richard L
SafariShootS
Oregon coast
 

Len Robertson

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
154
Format
Large Format
Hi Richard - Maybe you have figured out this isn't the most active forum on the Web. I just take a quick look every so often myself. Anyway, I saw your post finally.

I think everyone would love to see pictures of your Cirkuts, if you have a way of posting some. As to selling any, probably eBay would be the thing to consider. The market for Cirkuts has really died out with the difficulty of finding film, and digital/stitching taking over. If you aren't in a hurry to sell, you may want to start searching "Cirkut" on eBay, and get some idea of prices. However, #10s are few and far between, so it may take awhile to see one sell.

The original lens for a #16 Cirkut was a Turner-Reich 15"-24"-36" triple convertible. Look on the bed of your camera and see what is marked on the focusing scales. I'm guessing you will find 3 scales, marked for those 3 focal lengths. Over the years T-Rs came in a variety of shutters. I don't know which shutter would be "correct" for your camera. These lenses do show up on eBay from time to time. However they are supposed to be able to cover some of the larger formats like 11X14, so those users bid on them. I believe sometimes (maybe not always) this lens is marked "11X14" on the front ring surrounding the glass. Ones marked "8X10" are a 12" FL and not what you need.

I've long dreamed of having a #16, but I've seen enough posts by people who have used them to know shooting with one is beyond my talents. I have no idea what film would cost, if Ilford or someone would even cut rolls to this size, but I'm sure it is many dollars per foot. Do you have the tripod gearhead for the #16?

Len
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom