winston_smith
Member
You're welcome!
I'll be developing some test sheets tonight with a direct A/B comparison end to end (using sheets shot in camera of an actual subject instead of just a test wedge) between XT-3 and ID-11 1:1. Very curious how they'll turn out since the above conclusions were based on negatives I developed earlier in the year and there's definitely a chance there's something else wrong with my process that I can only see when doing a complete developing run that I didn't see when doing isolated tests.
So there's still a chance I'm doing something wrongBut either way, I think XT-3 with replenishment definitely shows promise.
Hi m00dawg,
I checked your website and I noticed you are using a lot of Fomapan 200. In my experience, Fomapan 200 has a very soft emulsion. I too had a similar problem many years ago and, in my case, it was the fixer. At that point in time, I was using an alkaline fixer which most likely softened the emulsion too much. May I ask what fixer do you use?
Best,
W.S.