It depends on direction of movement. As with freezing movement. Only contrary.
RattyMouse,
You can use some of the latitude towards overexposure instead of an ND filter. For my simulation of "Pedestrian's Foot" I used "B" and gave 1-2 seconds - completely ignoring the "correct" exposure and staying intent on the correct "movement". The negative was more dense than a correctly exposed negative, but printed easily.
This is the realm of pinhole, where it's easy to get exposures in the 10's of minutes. Unless you have milling crowds, it's amazing how well they disappear. if you are sticking with a lensed camera, the slowest film you can find and at least a 5-stop ND filter would be good start. Think in terms of minutes, not seconds.
2 seconds and crowds of people disappeared? That's all it took? Do you have a photo to illustrate this?
I thought this was going to be a joke about pulling out a slide projector
Yes, probably pinhole territory. I did try this with my cigar-box pinhole camera. I was experimenting - the hole was made with one of my father's insulin needles (very tiny), I put an ND filter over it, and used Harmon Direct Positive paper. I had done some math on exposure for all of this (and I'm bad at math), but have misplaced it at the moment. That, and I've not developed the paper yet, so I can't give time suggestions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?