The inkjet papedistinctive tallicr is OK sometimes but Epsons inkjet prints on 1/8" (or more) aluminum can be as photo-conventional-looking as any more traditional medium
hi koraks
places i have talked to ( being a photo geek like i am and being impressed about metal prints )
told me that they use a dye sublimation printer for aluminium prints. maybe their process was specialized?
no clue. the problem i have with metal prints is that display seems like a PITA...
Epson's very conventional mural-size inkjet machine prints on thick sheets of aluminum, not paper. Not flexible. I think it uses conventional Epson pigment, same as if printing on paper.
I don't know what PITA means.
In the Eighties I created and built a large exhibit systems for all Hyatt Regency Hotels that used large rear-illuminated Ciba transparencies. My design goal was a system that was almost invisible except for the seemingly free-hanging images. Very expensive for Hyatt. If Epson's aluminum prints were available back then I might have used them in some way instead of the rear-illuminated, triangular cross section columns that I did use. Although actual aluminum prints are expensive, I think they'd be less expensive than what Hyatt got, although that lovely rear-illumination wouldn't be possible. The Epson aluminum prints were better than was possible with the Ciba transparencies because a) fabulous whites b) fabulous blacks. Both are/were more "archival" than conventional photo alternatives.