• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

How important are consistent temps with B&W?

Do Not Come Here

A
Do Not Come Here

  • 3
  • 2
  • 38
Heavy

H
Heavy

  • 11
  • 5
  • 103

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,921
Messages
2,832,068
Members
101,018
Latest member
andycapp
Recent bookmarks
1
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Whether there is visual degradation of the print or not due to poor temperature control between processing baths, why compromise and risk it?

It is SO easy to get all processing liquids to exactly the same temperature by using a water bath. Give the liquids time to stabilize.

There is absolutely no reason not to exercise precision in the darkroom.

I personally believe that the harder one tries to eliminate large variations in the process, the better off we are, not only with respect to graininess, but also to achieving our expected outcomes with as little material waste as possible.
All errors are cumulative, and if we skip precision at every stage we end up with a process with pretty wild variations and poor consistency in our output. Yet with black and white darkroom chemistry it is stupidly easy to achieve. All you need is a thermometer and a little bit of patience.
 

mklw1954

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
397
Location
Monroe, NY
Format
Medium Format
Very important if you want to get good, consistent results. Kodak and other major chemical suppliers provide a lot of information on use of their chemicals to get the best results. If you don't follow it, you'll be all over the place, wondering how to adjust exposure in the camera and your developing process to get good results.

Use of a simple water bath to bring your tank and your chemicals to the right developing temperature is not difficult and will make a big difference in results.
 

tkamiya

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
Here's MY question.... (which basically echoes OP's question)

My understanding is, reticulation happens when film encounters a solution (of any stage) LOWER THAN THE PREVIOUS.

As a fellow Floridian, my processing starts with tightly controlled developer temperature, then room temperature stop and fix which are normally around 80F, then whatever comes out of city water supply for washing. During my process, temperature RISE at every step.

I've heard warmer temperature will cause softness in the emulsion. This has not been a problem. I've never seen reticulation either. Is temperature getting WARMER a problem??
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DREW WILEY

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,875
Format
8x10 Format
How important is correct air pressure in your tires? If you're trying to optimize your gas mileage or even wear on your tires, you might be pretty
nitpicky about this subject. Otherwise you can get away with some variability - up to a certain point. Go too far outside the parameters and
you end up with a flat or even ruined wheel. For most black and white work it is fairly easy to keep temperature well inside recommended tolerances. About all it takes is an oversized tray acting as a water jacket, which you dribble in either warm or cool water for drift-by processing. If the weather is too hot for that, put a block of blue ice in there. But for color processing you have to do better than that or
you'll be outright wasting your time.
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,769
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
I too live in Florida but my darkroom is part of our air-conditioned house so the only difference in chemicals are in film developing and at the most 3 - 4 degrees F. I turn the air a little colder before developing film and never had a problem. I agree that accuracy is important but I wonder how much of a difference is necessary before there is a visual change.

http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/
Dead Link Removed photography.com/
 

tkamiya

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
One of these days, I'll try icy cold developer, stop, fix, then wash it in "Florida cold" water just to see what happens......
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,804
Format
35mm RF
One of these days, I'll try icy cold developer, stop, fix, then wash it in "Florida cold" water just to see what happens......

It is not a good idea to try icy cold developer, as the developer temperature/time is quite critical. However, you could then try hot stop and fix at shorter times and then plunge the film into icy cold water and I still doubt you will get it to reticulate.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,409
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
A point that's entirely missed is most modern films from the major manufacturers are well hardened, but not all. Some have very poor hardening and then there are some developers with high pH particularly those containing Hryrodide which will soften the top coat of the emulsion

Two films which were very prone to micro reticulation were Tmax 400 older version) and Fuji Neopan 400, the latter is prone to full reticulation and frilling in Rodinal.

There's plenty of articles about the subject as well as work done at Kodak from the 1920's onwards when incipient or micro reticulation was first found to be a cause of increased graininess in prints. Trying to deny it can exist is saying that well known photo-chemists are (or were) wrong.

Ian
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,804
Format
35mm RF
There's plenty of articles about the subject as well as work done at Kodak from the 1920's onwards when incipient or micro reticulation was first found to be a cause of increased graininess in prints. Trying to deny it can exist is saying that well known photo-chemists are (or were) wrong.
Ian

Being a well-known chemist doesn't mean you are automatically correct and history is well documented with disproof of work by well-known scientists.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,409
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Being a well-known chemist doesn't mean you are automatically correct and history is well documented with disproof of work by well-known scientists.

Yes but we are talking about rather a lot of well known chemists from the 1920's onwards including those working quite recently at Kodak & Fuji. Plus a documented evidence that quite mild temperature shocks cause a very mild early form of reticulation that increases graininess.

The onus is on you and MichaelR to prove ithat Micro (Incipient) reticulation doesn't happen with an experiment repeatable by anyone with one of the softer emulsion films, and that doesn't mean cheating by using a tanning developer, but using a standard developer like Rodinal.

More seriously using a tanning developer helps enormously with softer emulsions like Foma and the old EFKE (Adox) films.

Ian
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,804
Format
35mm RF
Well one of the first questions I would ask would be - is there any visual evidence in the form of electron photo-micrographs of micro reticulation taken at recorded temperature variations, below that when visual reticulation is seen by the human eye?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom