I was going to say biscuits (American, not British). I can develop a roll of black and white film in about the same time it would take me to make a batch of biscuits from scratch. I think the amount of equipment required, and the level of complexity would be comparable. But pie works, too. Now I'm hungry. ;-)Developing black and white film is about as difficult as baking an apple pie and similarly requires a little patience, dexterity, foresight and ability to follow a recipe.
If you can tolerate information in the form of the written word, both Ilford and Kodak have documents aimed at providing the beginner with the necessary information. I prefer the one from Ilford.have seen basic youtube guides for developing film at home...
I'm generally someone that likes older things, and analog formats, tapes, vinyl, I even own a type writer. So, film photography fits right in for me.
I have seen basic youtube guides for developing film at home, and it seems you need either some sort of dark box/bag, or room with complete darkness, a patterson tank, and three chemicals.
But here's my question, how hard or time consuming is it really, is it something anyone can pick up, or does it take a lot of dedication?
The main reason that I am asking is because there are no places that develop film that are truly local to me, the closet is half an hour away. and then you have to pay them as well. I currently shoot instant films, but I think that 35mm film could be much more cost effective, if, and only if, I can actually do it at home.
That camera would leak light like a sieve. Don't get it, unless you want to put it on a shelf.
You will need to learn about exposure. You should get a 35mm slr with a meter. 35mm film is probably a better way to start than 120 - which can be challenging for very experienced people to load on reels.
In a sense, you've come to the wrong place. While it is pretty quick to develop a roll of film, and it's not complicated, the accumulation of stuff and the steps to get your negatives into positives both complicate and add massively to the amount of time involved. A lot of people like doing this because of that, actually - but many many darkroom workers gladly gave it up when digital was barely matured. Impatience and film photography don't go that well together.
It can take a day or a month to shoot 36 exposures.
It can take 40 minutes to develop, stop, fix that roll of film.
It can 6 hours or so to dry that film (to be on the safe side)
It can take an hour to scan that film or
It can take 5 minutes to contact print the negative sheet and potentially weeks to make satisfactory prints from each image (you're very unlikely to print each image).
Twiggy said:But here's my question, how hard or time consuming is it really, is it something anyone can pick up, or does it take a lot of dedication?
I'll have to see if it's 35mm or not
Okay thanks.
I see, I will probably stick with the Praktica then, I'll have to inspect it but it should be in working condition, appears good aesthetically. I'll have to see if it's 35mm or not.
I'll probably have to get a bag as I don't have any rooms in my home without windows, except for one, but one that has mandatory interfaces with LED screens, which of course emit light.
As far as making print goes, can't I just scan things, and then use some sort of software invert function?
I'm generally someone that likes older things, and analog formats, tapes, vinyl, I even own a type writer. So, film photography fits right in for me.
I have seen basic youtube guides for developing film at home, and it seems you need either some sort of dark box/bag, or room with complete darkness, a patterson tank, and three chemicals.
But here's my question, how hard or time consuming is it really, is it something anyone can pick up, or does it take a lot of dedication?
The main reason that I am asking is because there are no places that develop film that are truly local to me, the closet is half an hour away. and then you have to pay them as well. I currently shoot instant films, but I think that 35mm film could be much more cost effective, if, and only if, I can actually do it at home.
If OP wants to move from instant camera to a film camera plus develop own film plus print ...
I may be able to turn off the powerbar that is feeding the meters and their interfaces for a short while to make the room completely dark, for the loading process.
Sure. But if you have a basic darkroom already set up it's really not that difficult to make some so-called "contact prints."As far as making print goes, can't I just scan things, and then use some sort of software invert function?
Where are you - what part of Canada?
For those who already do this, what websites do you buy film from?
I'm checking on amazon, and 35mm film there, seems to cost more than instax mini. (which is $12.98 around here)
This is literally the cheapest black and white I could find, $13.44 for only 8 exposures..
But a large pack of 120 black and white Ilford film, costs only $22.
Sure. But if you have a basic darkroom already set up it's really not that difficult to make some so-called "contact prints."
Niagara.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?