That's a very puzzling and rather tendentious remark, which is factually incorrect too, at least when applied to the color materials used in the last 50-60 years or so. Of course, photographer's/printer's expertise is certainly hit & miss. The human is the weakest link in this chain. There's really no reason to cast doubt on color photography as a concept. It's robust.Color silver-based photography was always hit and miss
I think they still operate (?) but only in/from Malaysia. They used to have representation elsewhere on the planet (Canada?) but that office/location shut down a few years ago. Going from memory here; maybe @MattKing can comment. Either way, Bellini's products are generally excellent and there are no regular complaints with their current product lineup that I'm aware of.I thought that Champion was defunct? IDK,
Not intending to sound obtuse, my own first reaction would be to thoroughly wash out my equipment and switch back to what worked for me. Color silver-based photography was always hit and miss, especially with all these third party manufacturers of supplies. I spent my whole professional life in color in a similar field to photography. To this day I can't say I ever once made a perfect color match to suit me. The moral being, if you HAD something satisfactory to you with what you WERE using, then go back to buying that same supply. What i'm seeing here, even on a computer screen is entirely unacceptable. Throw the new chemistry out in the driveway and buy fresh of what you were using.
I think they still operate (?) but only in/from Malaysia. They used to have representation elsewhere on the planet (Canada?) but that office/location shut down a few years ago. Going from memory here; maybe @MattKing can comment. Either way, Bellini's products are generally excellent and there are no regular complaints with their current product lineup that I'm aware of.
Cyan staining is virtually always a problem with blix contamination in the developer. It takes only a little to destroy the developer. Try mixing some fresh developer that has not been in contact with any bottles etc. that you used for the developer up to this point.
With drums, you really should be using a stop bath. Also, a likely source of contamination of the developer is blix that lingers in the light trap of the drum. You need to rinse the drums really, really well before the next development run.
Double check that you mixed your developer correctly*.
Use stop! (In my experience it's essential, at least with drums).
If you don't need to economize heavily on the developer, don't use pre-wash. You will need a bit more developer to prevent streaking, but I get distinctively better whites when I don't pre-wash**.
* When I switched from Kodak RA-4 chemistry to Fuji I got horrible cyan/yellow cast, because I didn't buy proper developer starter for Fuji chemistry as I thought I'd use leftover Kodak starter in the same amount as with Kodak chemistry. Turned out that Fuji chemistry needed about four times the amount of the starter.
** Some paper will be more affected by this (with what I have observed, Maxima the most, DPII and Fujiflex much less). It also depends on the age of the paper. And also on use of the stop. Now I mix at least 3% acetic stop to preserve the whites. I'm pretty anal about whites, so... maybe others would never notice the difference.
You're right that freshly mixed and no potential for getting any blix in there should have avoided this problem. See if the stop bath makes a difference. Champion chemistry is marketed primarily for commercial labs; if their chemistry would suffer from serious flaws like this, I'm sure they would be in massive trouble. Not that I can explain this even if the developer is heavily expired, but was it old stock, by any chance?
I have 5% white vinegar and I dilate it 1:4 to get get it to 2% acidity, does that make sense? I can't remember where i got that info from. How should I dilute 5% white vinegar
I would worry about the developer first. So, check again that you're adding proper amount of replenisher, water and starter to get your working strength developer.
I dont add starter just use replenisher, should I use both? It says I can use just water and developer
I dont add starter just use replenisher
According to this you should.
Oh! That's not good. Replenisher is not a ready-to-go developer.
Well, it explicitly states it's a replenisher:The bottle itself said it was fine
Well, it explicitly states it's a replenisher:
View attachment 405075
The key differences between a developer and a developer-replenisher are that the latter:
* has a higher concentration of developing agents
* has a lower concentration of dissolved halides (specifically chloride in the case of RA4).
Furthermore, the pH may be slightly different for a replenisher.
There are two ways to make a working-strength developer from a replenisher:
1: add the required amount of starter and water as per the manufacturer's instructions
2: add the required amount of water and season the developer by running a volume of unprocessed paper through it. It's hard to tell how much exactly, but you should see the printing characteristics stabilize after a certain volume at which point the developer could be replenished with the replenisher upon continued use.
Option #1 is simpler, more consistent and when using drums also the more sensible approach.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?