I'd have to go against the grain and ask for a technical type camera with a full range of movements - a 6x9 with these features woudl definitely be something I'd like to own. I'd also like to see the option of different formats if possible ... say masks ranging between 645 and 6x9 would make this a mich more versatile and usable camera which could cover all needs.
Anything that a technical camera would do I can accomplish with my Horseman, or with any of a number of other commonly available older cameras. What is not commonly available is a light, portable, 6x9 wide angle folder. In the heyday of the folders, wide angle lenses were not as widely used, so the 35mm cameras had 50mm lenses where a modern one would have 35mm (e.g. Olympus Stylus Epic) and the 6x9s typically had a 105mm. A similar approach to 6x9 would give one a lightweight folder with a lens in the 75mm range, preferably with a coupled rangefinder.
Although not a folder, what you're describing is a Fuji GW or GSW 690. That would be a nice idea in a folder, and if you went the folding route, you could at least have some front tilt/swing at the lens, if you built the bellows right.
I haven't handled the Fuji, but have the impression it is a bit bulky compared to a folder. Is it?
there are also Horseman 6x9 and some Linhof 6x9 backs on the market that fit smaller than 4x5 dimensions.
Gordon, until I bought a Folding Pocket Kodak (for the lens, not to use) that had the finder attached to the front standard, which had a fair amount of rise/fall I'd have agreed with you completely. Of course, to do that trick on a camera with interchangeable lenses one would need a finder for each focal length ...Other than the Cambo or ALPA choices, there is also Silvestri. In fact, I think a Silvestri is what TheFlyingCamera is describing. It would be tough to get that range of movements and keep it at reasonable price levels.
A few comments about movements. The more tilt or shift available, the less likely you are going to be doing hand held photography with something like this. Sure, it is possible, but to really understand how the camera is working would require a ground glass, and not just guessing through a viewfinder.
<snip>
Gordon Moat
Dead Link Removed
Of course, to do that trick on a camera with interchangeable lenses one would need a finder for each focal length ...
No you wouldn't. Just think about it for a moment, and you'll see that you won't. You could use wire frames like on old plate cameras - or Speed Graphic's.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?