Would be nice, but no need. Luna Pro goes down to f/90, but I always measure for F/22 and then it's just one multiplier, which is square of the ration of my f/319 pinhole over f/22, which happens to be a fixed number 210. So I made a small table in excel for all required exposures corresponding to what Luna Pro shows me for f/22, and taped printed table to the back of the camera with clear Scotch. Attached is what it looks like. Easy-peasy, no math in the field. My final multiplier was tweaked based on actual tests after a couple of iterations.
Help understanding gray card use
-
A
- Thread starter 336v
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale NIKON 50mm f/1.2 Ai
- Started by Acere
-
For Sale Nikkormat FT2 body with or without lens.
- Started by waynecrider
-
For Sale Zeiss Linhof 135/3.5 Planar with Linhof Hood and Filter Slot - $1450
- Started by NortheastPhotographic
-
For Sale 5x7 and 13x18 Film holders
- Started by Rick A
-
For Sale 3 Wooden 8x10 Film Holders
- Started by Rick A
Forum statistics
Would be nice, but no need. Luna Pro goes down to f/90, but I always measure for F/22 and then it's just one multiplier, which is square of the ration of my f/319 pinhole over f/22, which happens to be a fixed number 210. So I made a small table in excel for all required exposures corresponding to what Luna Pro shows me for f/22, and taped printed table to the back of the camera with clear Scotch. Attached is what it looks like. Easy-peasy, no math in the field. My final multiplier was tweaked based on actual tests after a couple of iterations.
For a meter I only need the LV it gives me. I can figure out the aperture and shutter speed from there.
Sure, true statement for conventional cameras with lenses. For pinhole photography application it's actually twice as easy: - since the aperture is not variable and always the same for a given camera, you only need the light meter to show you EV number to determine a single parameter - the exposure time (for your fixed ISO). Never need to worry about aperture/speed combinations.
Yes and that what I refer to meter for general camera with variable shutter speed, aperture and even ISO.
Not with slide film, underexpose to safe with slides.
Still planning to calibrate both of my Luna Pro meters with as simple (to me) means as possible. I think I know what to do, just need confirmation I don't miss anything obvious... A search for DIY light box yielded few treads from a few years ago, but people talk about importance of the right color temperature for proper calibration. I absolutely get that - if you don't already have a calibrated meter to compare against, then you need a light source with close to daylight color temp.
HOWEVER, I have a modern DSLR, factory calibrated. So, say, I build a miniature light box - the size of a plastic can for 35mm roll of film, with bright white LED shining straight into either the lens of the DSLR (through a plastic diffuser of some sort) or into Luna Pro sensor. The LED's light output is very easy to control by feeding it from the variable current power supply. LED's color temp does not really change with brightness, but for the sake of discussion let's assume I use bright an incandescent light bulb (like for a car headlight), which will be noticeably redder in color as brightness diminishes.
Tell me why should I care about color temp change if I'm adjusting Luna Pro circuit for a particular EV reading which will sure be wrong when compared to a day light's color temperature, but so will be wrong the perfectly calibrated DSLR's readout, error'ing *by the same amount*. All I care about is for both meters to show the same EV number, regardless if that EV number itself is really overexposing or underexposing because of "wrong" color temp. Basically, all I want is my Lina Pro to show identical readings to the DSLR, so it becomes as calibrated as the DSLR is.
Anything wrong with this logic? Basically, to get good prints on film/paper you DO need to know correct EV number for this particular color temp environment. But just for comparing two pieces of hardware you don't.
If both are off by 5EV because of wrong color temp, but track each other and one is factory calibrated correctly, I'm still happy and will assume the second piece of hardware will get calibrated just as correctly as the first "reference" one. Is that right?
HOWEVER, I have a modern DSLR, factory calibrated. So, say, I build a miniature light box - the size of a plastic can for 35mm roll of film, with bright white LED shining straight into either the lens of the DSLR (through a plastic diffuser of some sort) or into Luna Pro sensor. The LED's light output is very easy to control by feeding it from the variable current power supply. LED's color temp does not really change with brightness, but for the sake of discussion let's assume I use bright an incandescent light bulb (like for a car headlight), which will be noticeably redder in color as brightness diminishes.
Tell me why should I care about color temp change if I'm adjusting Luna Pro circuit for a particular EV reading which will sure be wrong when compared to a day light's color temperature, but so will be wrong the perfectly calibrated DSLR's readout, error'ing *by the same amount*. All I care about is for both meters to show the same EV number, regardless if that EV number itself is really overexposing or underexposing because of "wrong" color temp. Basically, all I want is my Lina Pro to show identical readings to the DSLR, so it becomes as calibrated as the DSLR is.
Anything wrong with this logic? Basically, to get good prints on film/paper you DO need to know correct EV number for this particular color temp environment. But just for comparing two pieces of hardware you don't.
If both are off by 5EV because of wrong color temp, but track each other and one is factory calibrated correctly, I'm still happy and will assume the second piece of hardware will get calibrated just as correctly as the first "reference" one. Is that right?
I am not sure but I think the DSLR and the CdS sensor may shift their response to light vastly different from daylight differently. By the way I think they use 4700K light for calibration. But I would try to keep the light fairly close to that color temp. I have some success dimming an LED light but at low level the LED light brightness changes so abruptly. I had much better luck by dialing the same amount of filtration on a dichroic color head.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 9,210
- Format
- 4x5 Format
With a bright light illuminating a frosted or opal glass screen, you can decrease illumination without changing color temperature by moving the glass further from the light source.
You can also attenuate the light with true neutral density by making a physical "screen". I created a 2-stop screen by cutting a couple circles from a Sony radio speaker grill and mounting them in a filter ring. I rotated them against each other until the rosette moiré pattern emerged then soldered the edge in a couple places to hold them together like that. Since we are not forming an image with this light, this is an effective way to reduce test light without changing color temperature.
I use a device that has a small enlarger bulb (I think it's same bulb as in a Beseler 23CII). I found color temperature varied immensely with changes in voltage. But when driven at near line voltage, and using a blue color correcting filter like 80B it's enough light to work with.
I use a microscope stand to move the opal glass screen up and down to further adjust.
I also created a holder for the "slides" that come with Sekonic incident light meter. These are calibrated to third-stop increments, so changing between the 80 ASA slide and the 100 ASA slide changes the light by 1/3 stop.
Other people have done the LED light source route. Serhiy Rozum has a github repository for a film camera tester, that you could simply build the light source from.
You can also attenuate the light with true neutral density by making a physical "screen". I created a 2-stop screen by cutting a couple circles from a Sony radio speaker grill and mounting them in a filter ring. I rotated them against each other until the rosette moiré pattern emerged then soldered the edge in a couple places to hold them together like that. Since we are not forming an image with this light, this is an effective way to reduce test light without changing color temperature.
I use a device that has a small enlarger bulb (I think it's same bulb as in a Beseler 23CII). I found color temperature varied immensely with changes in voltage. But when driven at near line voltage, and using a blue color correcting filter like 80B it's enough light to work with.
I use a microscope stand to move the opal glass screen up and down to further adjust.
I also created a holder for the "slides" that come with Sekonic incident light meter. These are calibrated to third-stop increments, so changing between the 80 ASA slide and the 100 ASA slide changes the light by 1/3 stop.
Other people have done the LED light source route. Serhiy Rozum has a github repository for a film camera tester, that you could simply build the light source from.
Good ideas Bill, thanks. I was thinking of LED current regulation for just final fine adjustments to dial desired illumination to get particular EV exposures. Rough illumination without changing color temp would be pure mechanical - I would make crude miniature version of window blinds - you can adjust them from practically not interfering to totally blocking the light. I thought about printing black stripes on two pieces of transparency film and overlapping them you can easily set any light attenuation moving one relative to the other. It could be elongated triangles printed, which you can insert or remove as black "wedges" on the path of light. The most simple way would be to just use white paper - stacking as many pieces as needed for desired light blockage. As I mentioned, the fine adjustment between [within] coarse steps per sheet of paper is done by adjusting the LED current.
Many ways to do it, and your post has added food for thought, very much appreciated! Just need to pick the most effortless way to accomplish this. If people are interested, I'll report the outcome here when I'm done done making something.
Many ways to do it, and your post has added food for thought, very much appreciated! Just need to pick the most effortless way to accomplish this. If people are interested, I'll report the outcome here when I'm done done making something.
You can easily get more dynamic range by just PWM-controlling the LED. Pick a sufficiently high PWM frequency and the inertia of the meter will not be confused with it; something like 10kHz will likely work. 10kHz PWM with 16 bit resolution can be made with e.g. an ESP32 microcontroller that costs a few bucks.
Sure. This is actually wrong forum to discuss embedded electronics but briefly - any microcontroller based project will require some level of programming and I'm not a programmer (and no plans to become one) even if PWM is primitive. Then I'll have to build a driver for the power LED a dev. I Can get 0-100% PWM signal from my arbitrary form function gen without bothering with EPS32 or any other uC. But my main argument would be - controlling current limit of a power supply with simply turning a knob already gives me 0-100% dynamic range of a LED - from completely off to full on. No PWM or any other technique will exceed 0-100% average current control (e.g. brightness) range anyway.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2010
- Messages
- 9,210
- Format
- 4x5 Format
It doesn't have to be film, it could be brass sheets - which may be better because you could cut them accurately and they wouldn't deform/melt/fade over time.
But dynamic range in practice will be very limited. That's why suggested PWM. If you combine both approaches, you have a useful dynamic range for testing a light meter. But if you don't want to go there, that's fine.
I think since PWM power the LED at full power there is no color shift. Reducing current can possiblly cause color shift?
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |