DREW WILEY
Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2011
- Messages
- 14,062
- Format
- 8x10 Format
A tiny ping. Big deal. It's not like triggering my Pentax 6X7 and having brick chimneys collapse half a mile away : KER-LUNK !
Hee hee... I find the P67 ker-clunk sounds very pleasant and refined, while the Fuji 690 "pink" sounds cheap. But the optical results of both are excellent, so...A tiny ping. Big deal. It's not like triggering my Pentax 6X7 and having brick chimneys collapse half a mile away : KER-LUNK !
Thanks you so much for all this detailed insight! I think I gravitate towards the Plaubel, if this wasn't obvious from the beginning ;-) Let's see. I spotted one the other day, CLA´d from a reseller but it was gone too quick … will search for more temptations ;-)
It's supply and demand - look at the price of the FujiFilm GF670. Arguably the nicest folding rangefinder made, but they only manufactures one batch, and it did not sell well, so very few were made. The Plaubel 67 is similar - except it does not need batteries.I think in terms of price, plaubel makina is a bit hyped nowadays and the prices have gone up a bit too much in my opinion. On the other hand, even though fuji digital cameras are overhyped, fuji film cameras are much less hyped so the prices have stayed a a reasonable level. I haven't owned a plaubel makina so I cannot say for sure about the end result but my fuji gw690 pro ii gets the job done beautifully.
I think in terms of price, plaubel makina is a bit hyped nowadays and the prices have gone up a bit too much in my opinion. On the other hand, even though fuji digital cameras are overhyped, fuji film cameras are much less hyped so the prices have stayed a a reasonable level. I haven't owned a plaubel makina so I cannot say for sure about the end result but my fuji gw690 pro ii gets the job done beautifully.
Meanwhile I got my Plaubel yesterday.
I don't have the Mamiya-7 anymore, and don't have an archived comparison photo (I thought I did), but here they are with a Mamiya-6, the "7" is about 1cm wider, and does not collapse. The FujiFilm GW690 series is definitely big.
View attachment 379079
Here is the Makina and Mamiya (without lens) from above, the Mamiya depth is just minimally larger, but you have to close the secondary shutter to remove the lens, which you can accidentally trip to open, so it's preferable to leave a lens on.
View attachment 379080
I do find the grip on the Mamiya-7 to be very ergonomic - it's easy to walk around with the camera in one hand. I cannot say the same for the Makina, but it's design goal was different. Personally, I find the Mamiya more "Leica" like than the FujiFilm, it has AE and a spot meter, controls are easier to adjust, it's fast and quick to capture fleeting moments. It also has a better viewfinder.
I think you will like the Makina, I bought mine way back when they were "just expensive", and I've never had the urge to sell it. You do have to take care of them more than the Mamiya or FujiFilm, but that goes with any folder. It has traveled a fair bit with me, especially when cycling, hiking or canoeing. On the other hand, the Mamiya-6/7 was great for things like weddings.
Most Makina-67s were manufactured by Mamiya, including the one above - the early Copal made ones often had issues.
I have a Mamiya6 with all lenses in IMO, it is the best MF travel camera. My Hasselblad stays in the studio, where it is the reigning champion.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |