What they are is a group of amateurs (in the literal sense of the word: someone who does what they do because they love to do it) who are willing to pour their time, effort, and money into a damn near impossible project, in the hope that they can resurrect something truly worthwhile.
*sigh*
Still no interest in their B&W film. They missed their chance to have me as a customer when I bit on the E-6 bait and switch. I doubt with Kodak getting back into slide film there'll be any market for their E-6 offering. But I amuse myself greatly by even typing "their E-6 offering"
Hopefully a bit more than 100 per day. But it will all be single rolls of 36 exposures. And 120. We're determined not to relaunch until we have 35mm AND 120.
Bulk rolls will eventually be added to the product roster, but not until we've increased production significantly.
But to be fair, our factory team is comprised of entirely professional people, not amateurs.
Don't tell the Italian government that Ferrania is not a commercial enterprise or they will lose all their funding and support.Of course - and I most certainly did not mean to downplay that. They're both, it seems to me: they're highly educated people who have a large amount of valuable professional experience making photographic materials -- but they're also willing to go way out of their depth in all the other aspects of running Ferrania, precisely because they're driven by passion, not greed, making them true amateurs. Again, I use the word in the literal sense: an amateur is someone who's driven by his love of the work, as opposed to the professional, who works for money.
Kodak seems to still be plodding along steadily with Ektachrome, and, I am very much concerned that, once this comes out, hopefully at a reasonable price, it will kill Ferrania stone dead.
Kodak seems to still be plodding along steadily with Ektachrome, and, I am very much concerned that, once this comes out, hopefully at a reasonable price, it will kill Ferrania stone dead. A few enthusiasts (myself included) might try Ferraniachrome, but I cannot see sufficient users buying this regularly to generate enough money to support the ongoing enterprise, whether we define this as a commercial operation or a labour-of-love. Sorry.
Just a suggestion - this may not be a good thing to advertise!Plus, we're already proven that we are able to survive on practically nothing
A VERY good point! That's Kodak's Achilles heel - they are equipped to make LOTS of something and it's not clear they can be successful in making a little of something.Ferrania has a bit of an Ace up their sleeve in that they can in theory make small enough batches ...
For all involved, and in every way, a robust and dynamic market is better than a stagnant or shrinking market.
As the saying goes: "a rising tide lifts all boats"
Kodak seems to still be plodding along steadily with Ektachrome, and, I am very much concerned that, once this comes out, hopefully at a reasonable price, it will kill Ferrania stone dead. A few enthusiasts (myself included) might try Ferraniachrome, but I cannot see sufficient users buying this regularly to generate enough money to support the ongoing enterprise, whether we define this as a commercial operation or a labour-of-love. Sorry.
I hope I can still shoot Kodak, Fuji and of course Ferrania!It's truly hard to imagine a more stagnant market than the E6 market. If a competitor sells 10,000 rolls of film, that's 10,000 less sales for Ferrania. I cannot believe that such a loss in sales would be insignificant to Ferrania. The only thing to truly hope for is that the long expected Fuji exit from the E6 market happens as soon as possible.
Even if there is growth in E6 (which I dont believe there is), it is extraordinarily tepid, and not even close to being proven to have traction.
I'm an original supporter of the kickstarter effort so do not make such comments lightly.
I hope I can still shoot Kodak, Fuji and of course Ferrania!
I like all the E6 offerings, and would like to be able to enjoy all of them for what they offer.
It's truly hard to imagine a more stagnant market than the E6 market. If a competitor sells 10,000 rolls of film, that's 10,000 less sales for Ferrania. I cannot believe that such a loss in sales would be insignificant to Ferrania. The only thing to truly hope for is that the long expected Fuji exit from the E6 market happens as soon as possible.
Even if there is growth in E6 (which I dont believe there is), it is extraordinarily tepid, and not even close to being proven to have traction.
I'm an original supporter of the kickstarter effort so do not make such comments lightly.
Andec in germany is brinning their back E6-developing-line and its said they do it just for the return of Ektachrome.
Ferrania has the advantage of...
- sitting in europe. Their products might be more competitive in europe because there is no tax and rather short ways for shipment, therefore low shipping costs.
- maybe being able to produce in more appropriate volumes. They have scaled their production to nowadays market, i once read that Kodak would have to invest about 20 Mio.$ to do so, so the question is whether Kodak has done it or not.
- offering another "flavour". As there were people who just didn´t like Velvia 50 (oooooh the reds...) there will be people favouring Ferraniachrome over Ektachrome.
- having saved a lot of machinery to produce exotic formats. I mean how often is Kodak asked to bring back 126 or 127? Ferrania might supply a market Kodak doesn´t have access to.
In the end there still are some people who just stopped to shoot analog and whatever reason is bringing them back, everyone of them is an additional customer who does not create competition among the remaining film manufacturers.
@RattyMouse:
When Ektachrome was discontinued they said it was due to demand being too low. Wittner dug out Avichrome, saying that the remaining master rolls would at least last for 10 years - and now, 5 years later, the last master was cut down though Avichrome is very grainy, sometimes yellow in color and prone to light-piping due its PET-base. And now Kodak is bringing back Ektachrome.
I don´t quite buy the low-demand-theory.
As the impossible-project did show there is quite some demand for polariods, though the number of polariod-users surely was considered finite before they started to bring back polariods. I also don´t underdstand the growth-theory. As long as it is economical for a manufacturer to produce a certain ammount of goods per year, he doesn´t need growth. All he must be able to is to pay his expense and staff - so a certain number of customers per year would be enough for Ferrania.
If growth of 3-4% was that important for survival manufacturers of film should have died out when digital cameras came up in year 2000, during WWII, WWI, black friday, oil crisis in the 70s... every time growth was less than 3-4%. Though growth in analog film is like -500% for about two decades now there still are quite some manufacturers, if one does count in all the other B&W-manufactueres like Orwo, Foma, Adox etc. .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?