Hasselblad V series - best focussing screen

Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 0
  • 0
  • 8
Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 4
  • 0
  • 57
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 2
  • 2
  • 58
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 57

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,821
Messages
2,781,352
Members
99,717
Latest member
dryicer
Recent bookmarks
1

GLS

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
1,726
Location
England
Format
Multi Format
Yes they are stupidly expensive, especially considering that a new Acute-Matte D screen for the H series cameras costs less than half that figure. Supply and demand though.

That said, using one is a transformative experience and then you realise why they are worth the money.
 

StepheKoontz

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Messages
801
Location
Doraville
Format
Medium Format
Surprised no one has mentioned a Maxwell screen. I've yet to see anything that compares to these, not sure if he is even still around or how you would buy one though. I bought a batch of "seconds" from him 20 years ago (have them in multiple cameras now) and I've never seen another screen that even comes close.
 

GLS

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
1,726
Location
England
Format
Multi Format
I remember reading that a Maxwell replacement screen for a Pentax 6x7 costs $400, so not really a cheaper option.
 

StepheKoontz

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Messages
801
Location
Doraville
Format
Medium Format
They are not cheap, but IMHO they are the best and a very noticeably better than any of the other options. Glad to hear he is still in business!
 

Pieter12

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
7,596
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
yeah... that's a problem, I'm not using this s..t and I won't ever.
His screens are almost as expensive as the Hasselblad ones. Top-notch quality. If you re interested, he can be contacted by email maxwellprecisionoptics@yahoo.com
No connection, just a satisfied customer. Here's a screen shot of some of his options (I personally like the rule of thirds lines, enough to be able to line up horizons and verticals, but not overly intrusive):
Screen Shot 2019-11-28 at 12.50.02 PM.jpg
 
OP
OP

kal800

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
155
Location
Gdynia, Poland
Format
Multi Format
Well, too late for me, as I bought Acute Matte D already. If the screen costs the same money as genuine Hasselblad, then I would have to add shipping, customs clearance and VAT, which would make it more than $500 in my case... too much for a piece of glass :wink:
 

itsdoable

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
823
Location
Canada
Format
Medium Format
How do you focus using cross hairs? I use to focus using split screen in most cases.
You don't. You just have to focus directly on the screen without any other aids.
You focus like GLS say, and you make sure both your image and the cross hairs are sharp. That tells you the aerial image and the cross hairs are on the same plane.

If you have ever taken photos through a mircoscope with the dedicated microscopy screen, it is a clear screen with a cross hair with mm marks.Because the screen is clear (not frosted) it transmits the aerial image only, which is also a lot brighter - a regular frosted screen would be too dim to see or focus. The cross hairs are used for both scale and a focus aid. The aerial image can be above or below the screen and your eyes will focus naturally on them, so when both the cross hairs and the image is focused to your eyes, then they are on the same plane. However, because microscopes also have a very small aperture, the depth of field on the aerial image is great, which makes it hard to get the plane coincident. The standard technique is to move your head (eyes) from side to side, and if the aerial image is above (or below) the cross hairs, the parallax will cause them to appear to move differentially. When the cross hairs and image don't move wrt each other, you have achieved focus.

Prismatic screens like the Acute Matte break up the aerial image when they are not on the same plane (same as the split image and mircoprism aids do). And because they are transmitting the aerial image, they are very bright. However, when you are very close to focus, the shallow prisms (which are needed for the slower lenses) don't break up the image significantly, so the image looks sharp. Hence the complaint that the critical focus point is a little vague. For f/4 lenses, this has not been an issue as you are usually within the DoF, but it's very noticeable at f/2. Checking that the image and the cross hairs looks sharp to your eye is enough to get that last bit of critical focus (no need to move your head side to side).

Acute Matte D resolves this issue (I think by switching over to a lenticular screen, which is used by most modern SLRs - I don't own a "D" so I have not been able to check)
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom