And since 24x36 is actually a crop of all the larger formats, the 'crop factor' is proven to be a mental crutch for FL 'equivalence' to change from format to format for those unaccustomed to working in different formats. (I shot in 4 formats but never previously used any 'crop factor' -- except initially when going from 135 to digital APS-C...using the same set of lenses for both, which had never happened before.)
I often joke that I only use full frame because I can't figure out the crop factor.
Nothing has created more confusion in the world of photograph than "crop factor" (no, not even the zone system.) I used to frequent a mostly digital forum and almost every day I'd see one or the other strange misreading of what it was and how it worked. One person was asking some questions about using an 25mm APS-C lens on a Micro 4/3 camera and was convinced that he needed to do two calculations--APS-C to FF, then FF to M4/3 because a APS-C 25mm was different than a FF 25mm--so (25*1.5)/2. People on the forum tried to patiently explain that 25mm was an unalterably real world physical value that was independent of sensor size, but he kept arguing and arguing until I decided never to click on that thread again.
Today I just tell people to look in the viewfinder to figure it out, and learn that each sensor/film size has its own view of a focal length.
As a joke I told those people that I only use FF because it has no crop factor.
Actually, FF does have a "crop factor". It's about 2X. The original "35mm" format (1889) was 25.4 x 19mm. When Leica came out with the 24x36mm image size, it was often called "double-frame" or "Leica format". It was much later that the terms "half-frame" and "full-frame" evolved.
It has no crop factor although it's larger than the original 35mm movie frame. Why? because those people who talk crop factor take the 24mm x 36mm as GOD which all other format are measured by. (strangely many of them never used a 35mm camera) They would say a medium format camera has the crop factor of say 0.65 or something like that.
But the rest of the universe seems to have internalized 35mm/36x24 focal lengths so much so that I’ve seen digital system that use the 35mm focal lengths to display to the user, despite the fact that the actual sensor is smaller than the fingernail on your smallest finger.
Which doesn't make a lot of sense because a lot of people who use the 35mm equivalent focal length never actually use the 24x36mm format.
It has no crop factor although it's larger than the original 35mm movie frame. Why? because those people who talk crop factor take the 24mm x 36mm as GOD which all other format are measured by.
There is no God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?