It won't. The additional density can be printed through very easily. Exposure times aren't problematically longer than with other films. I noticed no effects of the base on contrast in the sense of altered or reduced filtering possibilities.I split grade print and I am figuring the tint will make things a bit interesting.
So I developed my first two 120 rolls of this stuff. Why would a film manufacturer ever think it was a good idea to have such a heavily tinted substrate?
I split grade print and I am figuring the tint will make things a bit interesting.
I'm thinking I will just stick to Ilford.
Developed two rolls of Fomapan 100 (Rodinal 1+50, Adofix) this weekend. No color....the heavy magenta colour ..
What I find odd it is my last roll of Ultrafine Extrem 400 is edged marked Ultra, my 35mm Ultrafine 400 is marked UL Tranfine exream 400, all my Foma is edged Marked Fomapan, well the 200 and 400, I have not shot any 100 in a very long time. Here is poor quailty scan of my last roll of Ultrafine. Sorry it is hard to see the edge marking. View attachment 280179
That looks like some sort of massive overall stain (catechol can effectively behave as a coupler - after all that is all that the 'stain' image from staining developers is...). You might be able to de-mordant it somehow. It likely results from the exhaustion of some part of the pyrocat when used in the manner you claim.
They also may have a serious bottleneck in the confectioning (including edge printing) part of the process - particularly if they have to contract that out.
Nope.Seems to me they are packaging whatever is left over from contracted film runs and calling it
Even if your developer interacted with the dye, I would expect the magenta to be superimposed on the dull gray base, and not replace it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?