• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Five most durable cameras of ALL time?

Manners street Lads

A
Manners street Lads

  • 2
  • 0
  • 25
Arkansas Ent

A
Arkansas Ent

  • 4
  • 2
  • 55

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,048
Messages
2,849,136
Members
101,623
Latest member
Ohio in Photography
Recent bookmarks
0

FoidPoosening

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
174
Location
NYC
Format
35mm
Correct me if there's a better section for this, but I thought I'd post it here since I didn't want to restrict this question to a specific format.

A lot of companies that manufactured the cameras we use either have gone out of business or ceased production. In your opinion, what are the five most durable film cameras of all time? One way or another, what cameras are you confident will still be working 25, 50, 100 years from now?

Any format is fair game. Feel free to separate it out into 2x lists (purely mechanical vs. electric) if you want.

Factors I specifically think of when I think durability:
-Mechanics
-Electronics (if applicable)
-Ruggedness (can I travel around the world with it and not have to worry about it, maybe drop it, face inclement weather)
-Ease of repair
-Anything else you think applies

GO! :smile:
 
I would put the Kodak Signet 35 on that list. Originally designed for military use it's carved out of a solid chunk of aluminum alloy. The shutter is easy to repair, and it's still going strong after over 65 years.

Kodak Signet 35 by Bryan Chernick, on Flickr

I would also put the Leica III models on that list.
 
Not exactly five because some are so similar:

-----35mm-----

1. Leica M3 and M2
2. Nikon F and F2 (plain prisms), Nikkormats
3. Canon F-1, F-1n, F-1N (fully manual)
4. Pentax H-series through Spotmatic F.
5. Toss up between Argus C-3 and Nikon F6 (j/k)

-----Medium format-----
1. Kodak Brownies
2. Pre-1950 Folders
3. Press or field cameras

-----Large format-----
1. Press, field, & view cameras

Of course, pinhole cameras always work.
 
Last edited:
Graflex
Speed Graphic
Kodak Brownie Hawkeye Flash camera, I have one without the flash
Early Nikons
Early Canons
Minoltas
 
Last edited:
Not exactly five because some are so similar:

-----35mm-----

1. Leica M3 and M2
2. Nikon F and F2 (plain prisms), Nikkormats
3. Canon (old) F-1

Curious as to why you say old F-1 specifically, versus F1N?
 
Curious as to why you say old F-1 specifically, versus F1N?

You're right. Body alone, the F1N is probably equally rugged and durable (maybe better?) - I tend to think of the F1N as usually having the AE finder at least and often the motor drive.

I'll edit my list.
 
I don't think I've handled a box brownie that didn't work.
 
I assume we are discussing commercially made cameras and not oatmeal box pinhole ones. The failure rate of any mechanical system is proportional to 2N where N is the number of critical components. Therefore any durable camera must be a very simple one. My choice goes to the Kodak box Brownie. They had but one moving part. They came in many models but were all of the same design.
 
Last edited:
You're right. Body alone, the F1N is probably equally rugged and durable (maybe better?) - I tend to think of the F1N as usually having the AE finder at least and often the motor drive.

I'll edit my list.

So in your eyes AE finder = less durable? I'm curious as to why that might be (apart from meter failing over time obviously, but camera could still be used with handheld meter) unless this is what you meant.
 
Anything made of Bakelite.
 
Instead of arguing whether this model Nikon or Hasselblad, etc is more durable than another it might be better to eliminate all those models of any camera that have a common known flaw. I can think of several cameras that are known for a particular kind of failure.
 
None of the above stand up well in a rainstorm, let alone underwater.

Ergo, I suggest Nikonos V.
 
So in your eyes AE finder = less durable? I'm curious as to why that might be (apart from meter failing over time obviously, but camera could still be used with handheld meter) unless this is what you meant.

If the AE finder fails, then you lose aperture priority - but certainly the camera can still be used manually.

So, by saying "F-1N (fully manual)" I'm trying to imply a fully manual configuration is what I consider most durable in contrast to a configuration where components have been added with the expectation of using aperture or shutter priority.

It's not that I'm singling out the finder - it's that, as Gerald mentioned, the more components you add, the higher the failure rate.
 
A simple wooden pinhole camera. It even floats when dropped in water, no need for batteries and all the maintenance you'll need is rubbing its soar places with some ear wax.

Noon-pinhole-6x12_001.JPG
 
I think most view cameras would still work in 100 years from now. I have a view camera from 100 years ago and it´s still functional. Unless the bellows gets cracked or the shutter becomes totally deprived of lube, I don´t see a reason why these cameras should fail.
 
Starting big and working my way down:
Deardorf(never owned one but knew someone who dropped one from the New Jersey Palisades and it only suffered the lose of a sliver of wood with no other damage.)
Rolleiflex F models
Leica iii models,m3,m4,nikon f,f2
Minox iii
Nothing with a battery. With electronoc progress a time may come when absolutely no batteries be made...not even for hearing aids...so nothing with even the simplest electronics on my list. Thus I exclude my tank-like nikkormats.many contemporary cameras are irrepairable just a few years after manufacture because the electronics are no longer available.
 
Nikon S2
 
A simple wooden pinhole camera. It even floats when dropped in water, no need for batteries and all the maintenance you'll need is rubbing its soar places with some ear wax.

View attachment 156414
Now *that* made me laugh. 'very hard to argue with.
 
Topcon Super D. It was used by the U.S. Navy. If dropped, it will usually leave a dent in whatever it hits.
 
Topcon Super D. It was used by the U.S. Navy. If dropped, it will usually leave a dent in whatever it hits.
I have four Super D bodies, and ALL have fully functioning and accurate shutters, per actual exposed film testing. Two of them have accurate meters, but two meters are non-functional.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom