Is there any chance of Kodak coming out with a new professional grade C-41 or E-6 film ? Not Gold, but something special like high-speed Ektachrome, or an E-6 Kodachrome look alike?
The resources required would be enormous. Harman is doing well considering the difficulty of producing color film.
A new 400 iso E6 film from Kodak would be cool to see, they can base it off/reformulate Ektachrome 400X
Nice images. I might just get some 120 Phoenix for use in older cameras. I am wondering what 1930s lenses could do with Phoenix.
Is there any chance of Kodak coming out with a new professional grade C-41 or E-6 film ? Not Gold, but something special like high-speed Ektachrome, or an E-6 Kodachrome look alike?
The resources required would be enormous. Harman is doing well considering the difficulty of producing color film.
If this is true, it can affect Harman strategy.
Lucky C-41 rumors are now a few years old “news”. Along with new Yashica C-41 film that never materialized. Not to mention that we are nearing the 4-year deadline for Adox proper C-41 film.
It won't affect Harman's strategy. It may affect Harman's market introduction and their marketing mix (incl. pricing).
How? In the sense that Harman would simply give up?
Not my shots but I thought these images on Phoenix 200 in 120 by someone in my Flickr stream were excellent. I hope Alex Schubert won't mind me sharing them here!
Nadernach by Alex Schubert, on Flickr
Nadernach by Alex Schubert, on Flickr
Nadernach by Alex Schubert, on Flickr
Here's one example from the day. In the rest of the roll, the greens and blues are even more muted. Everything skewed into warmer tones. I had these scanned at the lab, maybe I'll scan a few and see if something happened during scanning to add to the problems?
Not a 1930s lens, but a 1950s triplet (Novar) on a Super Ikonta III:
View attachment 382149
Here's one example from the day. In the rest of the roll, the greens and blues are even more muted. Everything skewed into warmer tones. I had these scanned at the lab, maybe I'll scan a few and see if something happened during scanning to add to the problems?
Are you all shooting Phoenix at 200 or 125?
I've been shooting at 125 for several months but haven't developed any yet. It will be a while until I have enough films to mix up some C-41 chemistry.
I recall Harman themselves saying that Phoenix is actually 125ISO but they DX coded it as 200 because that worked best with more simple cameras. If I get any in 120 I might well try shooting at 125, depending on the scene. I've had over exposed frames at 200 where a substantial part of the frame was sky and the highlights are simply blown out. And that's with two different cameras, an SLR and a P&S. If one follow's Harman's advice to fill the frame with the subject, 125 should work.
I've devised a method to virtually eliminate halation, improve highlight/shadow detail preservation, and significantly improve color balance.
Full article: taming the phoenix
They send it to a big lab. I ordered the development and prints in 13x18 cm.
I've devised a method to virtually eliminate halation, improve highlight/shadow detail preservation, and significantly improve color balance.
Full article: taming the phoenix
Harman Phoenix 200 is decidedly terrible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?