• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Film noir 'look' - suitable film?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,679
Messages
2,828,442
Members
100,887
Latest member
markcesene
Recent bookmarks
2

Curt

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format
This is a suitable film. It was made at the end of the Film Noir period - 1958. The narration is an excellent description of this period.

http://youtu.be/hRSQ9JAAVFM
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Since this question has been asked several times on APUG I keep waiting for some enterprising individual to repackage a film in a spiffy black box with white lettering and call the film Noir. :smile:
 

yulia_s_rey

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
256
Location
Madrid, Spain
Format
Multi Format
IMO magic bullets (magic films) don't exist.

^ I could not agree any more. In film school, I was taught how to emulate the "look" attributed to the film noir era. Which, simply put, is a low-key setup with a few "kicker lights" in the right places. The stock you choose should be the one you know inside and out in terms of latitude. Choosing the what lens speed (& shutter speed in still) you use and where to put the lights - that's all part of the craft.

Btw, I was surprised that there weren't any neo noir films mentioned on this thread. Imo, these films showed us how the now, almost blasé "noir look" could be modified by the DP in order to achieve something not seen everyday. (Blade Runner, Dark City, LA Confidential)
 

Christopher Nisperos

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
456
Location
Paris, France
Format
Multi Format
Film noir is mainly about lighting. Duh!

But we aren't talking about how they did it then. We are talking about how to mimic "then" now.

Amen.

Hi y'all, it's me, Christopher Nisperos. I don't post much these days but due to a lack of time, I usually "lurk-browse" a bit. In this case, I couldn't help adding my ten cents. However, but before wading it, here's a quick story to set the tone of my reply:

In the olden days, when I served as a tech rep for the distributor of Nikon, Mamiya, Bronica, Sigma, Durst, Metz, Sinar/Bron, Kindermann, et al (same distributor), I worked at zillions of trade shows, 'in-store demos', seminars and lectures fielding ga-billions of tech questions from consumers. It became quickly obvious to me that WE photographers are obsessed with questions about technical details regarding equipment, materials and techniques that may or may not (at all) be very important to the result of our efforts. We hair-splitters (yes, I often count myself among the group) are known to the manufacturers as "techno-weenies". We ask questions such as, "How many elements are in this (Leitz/Nikkor/Zeiss) lens?", which could just as well be answered with, "As many as were deemed necessary" (and yes, I'm very aware that certain users need and use this information for valid reasons, so please save the logical explanations for another day. Most who ask these types of questions never buy the equipment ... we just wanna show that we know stuff).

Therefore --about getting the film noir "look"---, just a reminder: Don't rely on anybody's book or advice for a definitive answer. Sure, ask a few questions, but then test for yourself. Then test again. What counts most is our vision of how we want a photo to look: how we visualize the result (can you spell A-n-s-e-l ?).

Almost ANY film (and developer combination) will work --or, at least get you very close to what you have in mind-- if you do it right. "Film noir" is mostly about LIGHTING ... even with flashlights, kerosene lanterns or candles... especially since there is not a single, "standardized", formulized, 'official' film noir look! (yurisrey said something to this effect .. perhaps others too on the thread.. I haven't read all posts). Alton's book shows lots of examples, but not a whole lotta lighting schemes. It's also useful to read-up on the history of this lighting, particularly the influence of early German cinema lighting.

So, my dear colleagues, let us stop splitting hairs and asking endless questions (the French have a very comical-if-obscene expression for this: "enculer les mouches" http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/enculer_les_mouches).. Get out there and try a few things. Then GIVE advice here, to help stop the next fly buggerer.

Like i said, just my ten cents... maybe even a quarter. Sorry if this seems as if coming from my 'high horse'...that's not my intent. I just wanted to inspire some action (and am curious to see some results!)

Good light,

Chris
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TheToadMen

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
3,570
Location
Netherlands, EU
Format
Pinhole
Amen.

Hi y'all, it's me, Christopher Nisperos. I don't post much these days but due to a lack of time, I usually "lurk-browse" a bit. In this case, I couldn't help adding my ten cents. However, but before wading it, here's a quick story to set the tone of my reply:

In the olden days, when I served as a tech rep for the distributor of Nikon, Mamiya, Bronica, Sigma, Durst, Metz, Sinar/Bron, Kindermann, et al (same distributor), I worked at zillions of trade shows, 'in-store demos', seminars and lectures fielding ga-billions of tech questions from consumers. It became quickly obvious to me that WE photographers are obsessed with questions about technical details regarding equipment, materials and techniques that may or may not (at all) be very important to the result of our efforts. We hair-splitters (yes, I often count myself among the group) are known to the manufacturers as "techno-weenies". We ask questions such as, "How many elements are in this (Leitz/Nikkor/Zeiss) lens?", which could just as well be answered with, "As many as were deemed necessary" (and yes, I'm very aware that certain users need and use this information for valid reasons, so please save the logical explanations for another day. Most who ask these types of questions never buy the equipment ... we just wanna show that we know stuff).

Therefore --about getting the film noir "look"---, just a reminder: Don't rely on anybody's book or advice for a definitive answer. Sure, ask a few questions, but then test for yourself. Then test again. What counts most is our vision of how we want a photo to look: how we visualize the result (can you spell A-n-s-e-l ?).

Almost ANY film (and developer combination) will work --or, at least get you very close to what you have in mind-- if you do it right. "Film noir" is mostly about LIGHTING ... even with flashlights, kerosene lanterns or candles... especially since there is not a single, "standardized", formulized, 'official' film noir look! (yurisrey said something to this effect .. perhaps others too on the thread.. I haven't read all posts). Alton's book shows lots of examples, but not a whole lotta lighting schemes. It's also useful to read-up on the history of this lighting, particularly the influence of early German cinema lighting.

So, my dear colleagues, let us stop splitting hairs and asking endless questions (the French have a very comical-if-obscene expression for this: "enculer les mouches" http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/enculer_les_mouches).. Get out there and try a few things. Then GIVE advice here, to help stop the next fly buggerer.

Like i said, just my ten cents... maybe even a quarter. Sorry if this seems as if coming from my 'high horse'...that's not my intent. I just wanted to inspire some action (and am curious to see some results!)

Good light,

Chris

You'r quite right!!
Just one question: How many RAM is in your computer? And what type of processor did you use, being able to type such a fine post?
:D
 

Pat Erson

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
336
Format
35mm RF
""enculer les mouches"... Yup and we also say "stop sodomizing the diptera"... :whistling:
 

Xmas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
Since this question has been asked several times on APUG I keep waiting for some enterprising individual to repackage a film in a spiffy black box with white lettering and call the film Noir. :smile:
Near?
Dead Link Removed
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Near?
Dead Link Removed

Yes, very close. The photo of te bride illustrates what this film is capable of producing.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
12,870
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Noir is my favourite sub-genre. What other genre do you see camera and lighting so vital to the look/feel of the film? Lots of dark with "pools" of light controlling what the viewer sees. It's the Notan of filmmaking. Camera positions (usually waist level or lower, sometimes tilted). Yup, you could have a lot of fun with this. As far as film goes, I would use whatever I had on hand and that would be HP5, pushed probably...
 

dr5chrome

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
461
Format
Medium Format
We started running this film for B&W-slides. This is a very good film, at least for transparencies.
http://www.dr5.com/blackandwhiteslide/rpx25dev1.html

Regards, dw/dr5.com





I am looking to shoot more in the noir sense - dark, contrasty, Moody.

I understand that managing lighting is important/fundamental - I am looking for suggestions on which film would retain highlight and detail in shadows as well.

Any suggestions on film - 120, 4x5 as well as any other input would be much appreciated. As well as what paper might suit such printing.

I would be using either xtol or dektol. Also have some Ilford chemistry, but will be principally using xtol.
 

TheToadMen

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 18, 2012
Messages
3,570
Location
Netherlands, EU
Format
Pinhole
I read this thread some time ago and was reminded of it when I saw this Kickstarter project for Film Noir photography.
I thought I just pass it along, if anyone might be interested to help this guy.
Dead Link Removed
 

Harry Lime

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 10, 2005
Messages
495
Format
35mm RF
I am looking to shoot more in the noir sense - dark, contrasty, Moody.

I understand that managing lighting is important/fundamental - I am looking for suggestions on which film would retain highlight and detail in shadows as well.

Any suggestions on film - 120, 4x5 as well as any other input would be much appreciated. As well as what paper might suit such printing.

I would be using either xtol or dektol. Also have some Ilford chemistry, but will be principally using xtol.

Try a two bath developer like Diafine for developing the film. You'll be able to exposure for the shadows , while the compensating action of the developer will make sure that your highlights don't blow out, but roll off as gently as possible.

A lot of the 'high contrast' look of film noir is simply a by product of film having mediocre shadow detail retention. With film shadows simply off quickly. The point is that many DOP didn't go out of their way to purposely turn up the contrast during development. It just happened. Something like John Alton's 'The Big Combo' is about as black and white as a movie can shoot. But Alton wasn't purposely pushing the film to be high con. He was just selectively lighting points of interest. Everything in the pools of light has the same silky smooth tonality we know from film. It's all in the lighting and then they struggled to squeeze as much tonality out of the existing film stock as they could.
 

NickLimegrove

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
57
Location
Berlin
Format
Multi Format
Contrast Ratio

Convention of film, noir http://www.slideshare.net/JAKEEKNIGHT/conevtions-of-film-noir is more than lighting but style and content as well.

Interesting read, thanks for sharing! I happen to know two or three things about Film Noir already, but what I was surprised to learn was this bit:

the typical [Noir] film shot in a 10:1 ratio of dark to light (typical movie is 3:1 ratio)

Assuming that those numbers are supposed to be read the way I would read them (»the brightest areas reflect 10 times more light than the darkest ones«), even a light contrast of 10:1 (= 3.3 stops) would already signify a scene so low in contrast that, as a BW still photographer, you'd probably respond with a one- if not two-stop underexposure and overdevelopment. ...but 3:1? I'm aware that professionally produced movies will usually be lit very evenly, as a glance at just about any random movie still might illustrate.

movies-the-grand-budapest-hotel-still-02.jpg


But still, a mere 1.5-stop range sounds somewhat odd to me. Wouldn't that mean that any two things in a scene that are more than 1.5 stops apart -- such as a ›white‹ guy's skin and his, say, dark blue suit -- will pose a problem and demand special treatment? Or am I missing something? [sorry for steering off-topic a bit... should I make this a seperate thread?]
 
OP
OP
analoguey

analoguey

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
1,103
Location
Bangalore, I
Format
Multi Format
No, please use the thread -its not that far off topic as threads go. If you do want to start another one, theres a 'lighting' sub-forum as well.

Sent from Tap-a-talk
 

markbarendt

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
Assuming that those numbers are supposed to be read the way I would read them (»the brightest areas reflect 10 times more light than the darkest ones«)

It is a "lighting ratio" not a "reflectivity ratio".

One measures how much light is "supplied" to the subject by the main light and then by the fill light and those readings are compared to find the ratio.

Since the measurements and camera settings are based on light supplied (incident light), there is no issue in getting light and dark subjects to look normal in these setups. No special treatment required.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Xmas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
I understand that managing lighting is important/fundamental - I am looking for suggestions on which film would retain highlight and detail in shadows as well.

Well noir for me means low key a le Citizen Kane with burnt in shadow pools but a full set of highlights and mid tones on eg the part of subjects face lit.

So any film will do but you may need VC paper.

Sketch first...
 

NickLimegrove

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
57
Location
Berlin
Format
Multi Format
It is a "lighting ratio" not a "reflectivity ratio".
One measures how much light is "supplied" to the subject by the main light and then by the fill light and those readings are compared to find the ratio.
Since the measurements and camera settings are based on light supplied (incident light), there is no issue in getting light and dark subjects to look normal in these setups. No special treatment required.

Okay, so those numbers are supposed to be be read differently from how ›we‹ would read them: key light vs. fill light... Taking an incident reading in the key light vs. in the key light yields a ratio of, say, 3:1. Makes a lot more sense now; thanks for clarifying.
 

markbarendt

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
Yep, one reading in key light, one reading in the fill light.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom