"there's no tech sheet". 95% of users don't care. Sure, it would be lovely to have one but they explained way back that they're sticking to publishing best practise info and pooling knowledge form those who actually use the film.
Dynachrome is a pipe dream. Nobody in their right minds is going to introduce a film that doesn't use one of the standard processes widely available now. The cost of setting up a processing lab alone would cripple a company like Film Ferrania, probably even Kodak.
If we take what Film Ferrania have been saying, the most likely step in terms of new products is P30 in 120....which they said they'd do after they got in-house production of P30 135 sorted. P30 is perfected in that it does what they want it to do. The product is consistent, well made and now manufactured from coating to the consumer product in the little boxes in-house at Ferrania. Some users like it. Some do not. That's irrelevant. The product is what it is. A recreation of 1950s P30. If you don't like it, that's cool. There's just no point moaning that it's not Plus-X or Pan-F. It's not supposed to be. Might as well argue that a TV won't blend smoothies. So the 120 film is going to appeal to those of us who find something we enjoy in 135, or who want to try it for the first time.
Could it be a colour film? THey've said that work on colour film has been ongoing in the background but we don't know how close they are. If they can recreate Solaris 100 or 200 and have a stable supply, then I'm in. Or "Scotch Chrome" but that's probably even more difficult.
I guess we find out what the announcement is tomorrow. They've been pretty quiet since the pandemic hit so I'm guessing it's more than hype. There is something tangible to announce. I follow them on facebook and instagram so will probably pick up on it at some point.